W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > December 2014

Re: FHIR Ontology from Cecil Lynch

From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 22:06:35 -0500
Message-ID: <54978ABB.8030802@dbooth.org>
To: "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org>
CC: HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, Claude Nanjo <cnanjo@cognitivemedicine.com>, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, Anthony Mallia <amallia@edmondsci.com>
On 12/21/2014 09:04 PM, Timothy W. Cook wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 8:08 PM, David Booth <david@dbooth.org
> <mailto:david@dbooth.org>> wrote:
>     But FYI, the reason Cecil presented his ontology was to allow us to
>     compare and contrast the various approaches that different
>     individuals have taken toward developing a FHIR ontology.  (Others
>     were presented previously.)  The joint HL7-W3C group on RDF for
>     Semantic Interoperability
>     http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?__title=RDF_for_Semantic___Interoperability
>     <http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=RDF_for_Semantic_Interoperability>
>     is working to converge on an ontology that could be adopted as a
>     standard by the HL7 FHIR work group.  As such, it is only an input
>     to our process rather than a final result (though Cecil may well use
>     it himself as currently is).
> ​Thanks for the clarification David.  Did I miss links to other ontology
> examples?
> If so could you re-post them or put them on the wiki page?

We have reviewed four FHIR ontology approaches, but now that you mention 
it, I don't think the others posted their actual ontologies, though they 
did post slides that are linked from the Work Projects section:

Tony, Claude and Eric, can you please post links to your FHIR 
ontologies?  Or if you don't have them on the web already you could 
(privately) send them to me and I'll post them on the web and then post 
a link to them.

David Booth
Received on Monday, 22 December 2014 03:07:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:21:45 UTC