Re: FHIR Ontology from Cecil Lynch

On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 8:08 PM, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote:

>
> But FYI, the reason Cecil presented his ontology was to allow us to
> compare and contrast the various approaches that different individuals have
> taken toward developing a FHIR ontology.  (Others were presented
> previously.)  The joint HL7-W3C group on RDF for Semantic Interoperability
> http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=RDF_for_Semantic_Interoperability
> is working to converge on an ontology that could be adopted as a standard
> by the HL7 FHIR work group.  As such, it is only an input to our process
> rather than a final result (though Cecil may well use it himself as
> currently is).
>
>

​Thanks for the clarification David.  Did I miss links to other ontology
examples?

If so could you re-post them or put them on the wiki page?


Thanks,
Tim​




============================================
Timothy Cook
LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook
MLHIM http://www.mlhim.org