On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 10:34 PM, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote:
>
> You might be able to extend XML that way, and it would be interesting to
> see what you could come up with, but if you went down that path I suspect
> you'd find at some point that you were ending up re-inventing RDF.
>
> Thanks,
> David Booth
>
​You may find this helpful:
http://www.topquadrant.com/2011/09/29/living-in-the-xml-and-owl-world-comprehensive-transformations-of-xml-schemas-and-xml-data-to-rdfowl/
There are several journal publications​ available on the subject as well.
HTH,
Tim
============================================
Timothy Cook
LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook
MLHIM http://www.mlhim.org