Re: hcls dataset description comments--Dataset Descriptions vs. PROV from Joachim Baran on 2014-08-28 (public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org from August 2014)

From: Joachim Baran <joachim.baran@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 13:52:56 -0700
To: Michael Miller <Michael.Miller@systemsbiology.org>
Cc: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>, Alasdair J G Gray <A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk>, w3c semweb hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, "pav-ontology@googlegroups.com" <pav-ontology@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID: <CAObSwHVm0VNF2csZpWf+zHA8uWc93LMDi0jBiFDH0qrze7vNeg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi!

On 28 August 2014 08:08, Michael Miller <Michael.Miller@systemsbiology.org>
wrote:

> i agree that it's hard to distinguish between 'clever and non-clever'
> functions but not if you change the criteria to the distinction between
> transforming and mapping  functions upon the data themselves, here we have
> a clear mapping function so i would lean towards import
>
  Fair enough. Does that also address Alasdair's comment about preservation
of knowledge content?

Kim

Received on Thursday, 28 August 2014 20:53:23 UTC