- From: Andrea Splendiani <andrea.splendiani@iscb.org>
- Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 13:53:38 +0200
- To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAJZps9jSFnEn0mtPy3j74mCFXbaJ8Pj5eXgek_ZF-GGdZH68_g@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, I have stumbled onto a problem for which I would like to hear from your experience. In a project, I am using the Human Phenotype Ontology ( http://www.human-phenotype-ontology.org/). For the sake of the project, I really only need the is_a structure of the ontology, but as an OWL version was existing, and as we have anyway an RDF framework to integrate data, I was thinking of using this version. The OWL version is not a simple representation of the is_a structure, as it is including axioms to map phenotypes to, from a quick inspection, anatomical parts and "qualities". Now, as with any ontology, I was at first trying to classify it. This is an ontology (with imports) of around 20k classes (<200k axioms, ~60k logical axioms). It is big, but not huge. I simply cannot classify it in any reasonable time. I have tried a variety of reasoners and, in my longest wait, I have waited for days but we are under 1%). Does anybody have experience in classifying it ? If classification is unfeasible, than which use cases does the OWL representation cater to? best, Andrea Splendiani
Received on Monday, 4 August 2014 11:54:06 UTC