Re: Identifiers (was Notes from today's meeting) from Joachim Baran on 2013-06-04 (public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org from June 2013)

From: Joachim Baran <joachim.baran@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 09:01:29 -0400
To: Jerven Bolleman <me@jerven.eu>
Cc: Michel Dumontier <michel.dumontier@gmail.com>, N Juty <juty@ebi.ac.uk>, Alasdair J G Gray <Alasdair.Gray@manchester.ac.uk>, "public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAObSwHU6PcWM4==ku+o5xmLjH6-pp6SVh2orG7oN33DpCZ+-zg@mail.gmail.com>

On 4 June 2013 08:56, Jerven Bolleman <me@jerven.eu> wrote:

> uniprot:P12345 a up:Protein ;
>
>>                        up:enzyme ec:1.2.3.4 .
>>> ec:1.2.3.4 a up:Enzyme .
>>> What if my data is
>>>
>>
> uniprot:1.2.3.4 a up:Protein ;
>                        up:enzyme ec:P12345 .
> ec:P12345 a up:Enzyme .
>
  I do not understand the new example. You just switched the identifiers?


> What if I don't have a regular expression for one of the sets?
>
  I suggest it implies the set of all URIs, i.e. the regexp: .*


> Or two very similar ones?
> e.g. mgi and pubmed?
>
  Take the union regexp.

Joachim

Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2013 13:01:57 UTC