- From: Sivaram Arabandi, MD <sivaram.arabandi@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:03:33 -0600
- To: RebholzSchuhmann <d.rebholz.schuhmann@gmail.com>
- Cc: Joanne Luciano <jluciano@gmail.com>, David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, public-semweb-lifesci <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, Michel Dumontier <michel.dumontier@gmail.com>, Conor Dowling <conor-dowling@caregraf.com>, Rafael Richards <rmrich5@gmail.com>
Agree with this and want to add one more - this statement from the document: "Meaningful Use currently mandates a patchwork of idiosyncratic formats, such as HL7, CCD/ C32, CCR, NCPDP SCRIPT, C-CDA and QRDA. While such formats provide a degree of machine processability, in comparison, RDF offers significant advantages:" - How can you compare RDF to these models? Surely you can serialize data that conforms to these standards into RDF, no? thanks Sivaram ___________________________________ Sivaram Arabandi, MD, MS ONTOPRO www.ontopro.com T 832.726.2322 E s.arabandi@ontopro.com Think Semantics. Tame Silos. On Jan 15, 2013, at 6:58 AM, RebholzSchuhmann wrote: > Hi, > > don't know how someone reads this, who does not know all these benefits anyways. Reads as if you are selling RDF to somebody who knows half-way the benefits of RDF. > It would have made sense to be more precise on the privacy and security issues. Neither RDF nor XML have been developed to address privacy / security, and either one is highly important in healthcare systems. Do you have even stronger arguments for privacy and security issues? > > Hope this helps. > > -drs- > > On 15/01/2013 12:41, Joanne Luciano wrote: >> Thanks for doing this. >> Joanne >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Jan 15, 2013, at 7:21 AM, David Booth<david@dbooth.org> wrote: >> >>> FYI, here is the comment that Rafael, Michel, Conor and I submitted to >>> the US government Office of the National Coordinator for Health >>> Information Technology, in response to their RFC on "Meaningful Use" >>> requirements, proposing RDF / Linked Data as a universal exchange >>> language of healthcare: >>> http://dbooth.org/2013/mu/MU-Stage3-RFC-Simple-Response.pdf >>> >>> Although it is too late to change that submitted comment (as the >>> deadline was last night), we would still appreciate any feedback or >>> suggestions for improvement, as I'm sure we will have to make these >>> arguments and explanations many more times in the future. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> -- >>> David Booth, Ph.D. >>> http://dbooth.org/ >>> >>> Loss of web prodigy Aaron Swartz: http://tinyurl.com/ahe2k8c >>> >>> Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily >>> reflect those of his employer. >>> >>> > > -- > D. Rebholz-Schuhmann - mailto:d.rebholz.schuhmann@gmail.com > >
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2013 15:04:03 UTC