- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 08:53:01 +0000
- To: "Bradley, Lily (HHS/ASPE)" <Lily.Bradley@hhs.gov>
- Cc: Eric Miller <eric@squishymedia.com>, "Lin MD, Simon" <LINMD.SIMON@mcrf.mfldclin.edu>, Joanne Luciano <jluciano@rpi.edu>, "Timothy W. Cook" <tim@mlhim.org>, "public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
On 6 December 2013 08:45, Bradley, Lily (HHS/ASPE) <Lily.Bradley@hhs.gov> wrote: > Thanks all! Very helpful. If I were looking at a dataset about hospitals, > what's the 'strongest' (I.e., most "linked") way to describe the content > of that dataset? > > Eric, Is this sufficient/useful for consuming Medicare hospital compare > data: https://data.medicare.gov/developers ? Other priorities for new > APIs? > > Simon, The US hospital characteristics file is also available via API: > https://data.cms.gov/d/xssf-xjt2?Category=Medicare&view_name=Provider-of-Se > rvices-File-OTHER-September-2013 The data dictionary is zipped on cms > website, but available as text here: > http://www.nber.org/pos/2011/POSQ.OTHER.LAYOUT.DEC11.txt > > Dan, Scott's in town next week. Which property would "hospital" best fit > into here: http://schema.org/Dataset We have a specific type for http://schema.org/Hospital ... whereas http://schema.org/Dataset is (currently) a kind of black box container for arbitrary data. There's isn't yet a good bridge between these two views of data. Either you express specific facts using types/properties, or you provide (say) CSV data files e.g. zipped, and call the whole bundle a 'Dataset'. But we're looking at ways of bringing things together, so that rows in a CSV data file that happen to describe the properties of (say) a Hospital can be exposed as such. There's a paper at http://www.w3.org/2013/04/odw/odw13_submission_53.pdf talking a bit more about this, and a proposed W3C group on tabular data, http://www.w3.org/2013/05/lcsv-charter.html so I'm interested to collect practical use cases. I'll take a look at the links above... cheers, Dan > Joanne and Tim, I will continue to explore those references. Thanks so > much!
Received on Friday, 6 December 2013 08:53:32 UTC