W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > October 2012

Re: Out of Cycle HL7 RIMBAA meeting Nov 20th Kaiser Pleasanton Technology Campus

From: <Michael.Lawley@csiro.au>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:18:14 +1100
To: <renato.iannella@nehta.gov.au>
CC: <Peter.Hendler@kp.org>, <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, <andy.stechishin@gmail.com>, <rene.spronk@ringholm.com>
Message-ID: <4EF4A09C-E903-4FBD-A554-653CC214F948@csiro.au>
One consequence is that you must omit anything in the situation hierarchy of SNOMED CT, but that is almost certainly a "good thing"


Sent from my iPhone

On 18/10/2012, at 2:27 PM, "Renato Iannella" <renato.iannella@nehta.gov.au<mailto:renato.iannella@nehta.gov.au>> wrote:

On 17 Oct 2012, at 08:11, Peter.Hendler@kp.org<mailto:Peter.Hendler@kp.org> wrote:

 We limit the SNOMED codes to the "what" part of the model, and we use the OO for the "who when where" etc.

Hi Peter, does this then limit your ability to detect (computationally) dependencies that go thru the OO model?

For example, Person has Allergy substance X and is prescribed Medicine Y (with active ingredient substance X)

Dr Renato Iannella
Lead Architect, Information & Policy Services
nehta - National E-Health Transition Authority
Phone: +61 7 3023 8578  Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206

Received on Saturday, 20 October 2012 20:28:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:21:17 UTC