- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:44:41 -0400
- To: Phillip Lord <phillip.lord@newcastle.ac.uk>
- CC: public-semweb-lifesci hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Hi Phil, I don't really find the use cases you suggest particularly compelling. Perhaps you could explain them in a bit more detail? Searching -- we do some degree of traditional SEO, and the lessons generally show up very well on major search engines Sorting -- I'm not sure what would be sorted? The lessons are presented in a particular order designed to help the understanding of readers who go through the material as presented Mashing up -- Can you give me an example? Referencing -- Generally speaking, we think that the URLs of the individual lessons are perfectly adequate for referencing thanks, Lee On 10/11/2012 5:24 AM, Phillip Lord wrote: > > I am a little surprised that you can't see use cases for adding > computationally extractable metadata to your articles. Searching, > sorting, mashing up, referencing and so on. > > RSS is a different point; ignoring it's "what's new" role, it happens to > be a reasonable source for computational metadata where there is nothing > else. > > Phil > > > > > > Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> writes: >> Thanks for the feedback. We didn't pursue an RSS feed for the site because >> it's intended to be relatively timeless educational content, rather than dated >> material. That said, I can look into adding one. >> >> Can you help me understand the use cases for using some of the other >> approaches you mention and what would be involved? I didn't really have any >> compelling use cases in mind off the top of my head to mark up these lessons. >> >> thanks, >> Lee >> >> On 10/10/2012 7:20 AM, Phillip Lord wrote: >>> This is an interesting set of pages. >>> >>> One thing that confuses me about this web site is that, as far as I can >>> see, it apperas to use no semantic web technology; certainly trying to >>> mine the web pages shows no metadata describing what the document is >>> about. We tried searching for OGP, various forms of metatags, prism, >>> COINs and so on, using our Greycite (http://greycite.knowledgeblog.org) >>> tool, and found nothing. We've tried visual inspection as well -- not >>> easy as all the HTML is on one line -- and again can see nothing. Tried >>> content negotiation for RDF, but this returns HTML. Even the normally >>> reliable RSS feed fails because there isn't one. >>> >>> Phil >>> >>> >>> >>> Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> writes: >>> >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> Many of you may already have come across Semantic University >>>> <http://www.cambridgesemantics.com/semantic-university>, but I'd like to >>>> announce it to this community. >>>> >>>> Semantic University is a free, online resource for learning Semantic Web >>>> technologies. We've gotten some great feedback over the past few months, and >>>> we feel that it's one of the most accessible ways for both technical and >>>> non-technical people to start learning about semantics and the Semantic Web. >>>> >>>> For those of you who have seen Semantic University before, we've re-organized >>>> the content into general Semantic Web Landscape content and into specific >>>> technical tracks oriented around RDF, OWL/RDFS, SPARQL, and Semantic Web >>>> Design Patterns. I hope you'll check it out as we think it's now much easier >>>> to use to learn about the Semantic Web. >>>> >>>> Semantic University currently includes over 30 lessons, and we're continually >>>> preparing new content. We're also looking for additional writers to contribute >>>> new lessons, so please contact me if you'd be interested. I'd especially like >>>> to start including content specific to particular verticals, and HCLS would be >>>> a great starting place. Please let me know if you'd be interested in >>>> contributing! >>>> >>>> Current lessons include: >>>> >>>> * An Introduction to the Semantic Web >>>> <https://www.cambridgesemantics.com/semantic-university/introduction-to-the-semantic-web> >>>> * Semantic Web Misconceptions >>>> <https://www.cambridgesemantics.com/semantic-university/semantic-web-misconceptions> >>>> * Semantic Web vs. Semantic Technologies >>>> <https://www.cambridgesemantics.com/semantic-university/semantic-web-vs-semantic-technologies> >>>> * RDF 101 <https://www.cambridgesemantics.com/semantic-university/rdf-101> >>>> * SPARQL Nuts and Bolts >>>> <https://www.cambridgesemantics.com/semantic-university/sparql-nuts-and-bolts> >>>> >>>> ...and many more. >>>> >>>> Please enjoy & we welcome all feedback & suggestions. >>>> >>>> best, >>>> Lee >>>> >> >>
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2012 17:45:09 UTC