Re: RDF Schema / LODD mapping -- Re: New proposal: health & medical extensions to schema.org

On 22 May 2012, at 23:34, Dan Brickley wrote:

> We don't say anything like that at a schema.org level. Sometimes
> classes have common members, sometimes they don't. If you want us to
> record inter-class disjointness relationships within schema.org we can
> look into that, but for now don't assume it "comes out of the box"
> with different Thing subclasses being automatically considered
> disjoint.

Dan/Arron, I was just seeing how far schema.org supports "semantics".

(Hence the smiley ;-)

Cheers...
Renato Iannella
Semantic Identity
http://semanticidentity.com
Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206

Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2012 02:44:34 UTC