- From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 12:43:30 +1000
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Aaron Brown <abbrown@google.com>
- Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
On 22 May 2012, at 23:34, Dan Brickley wrote: > We don't say anything like that at a schema.org level. Sometimes > classes have common members, sometimes they don't. If you want us to > record inter-class disjointness relationships within schema.org we can > look into that, but for now don't assume it "comes out of the box" > with different Thing subclasses being automatically considered > disjoint. Dan/Arron, I was just seeing how far schema.org supports "semantics". (Hence the smiley ;-) Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2012 02:44:34 UTC