- From: Bob Futrelle <bob.futrelle@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:59:55 -0500
- To: Oliver Ruebenacker <curoli@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Waard, Anita de A (ELS-NYC)" <A.dewaard@elsevier.com>, Helena Deus <helenadeus@gmail.com>, public-semweb-lifesci <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOsWdXoc7dFKbUWnwLQYfe_LVxzvN3=HxPYcd5QLVPEkE0U2OA@mail.gmail.com>
A great deal of the content of papers is *not* about numbers, but statements intertwined with propositional attitudes. Good evidence for this is in the use of hedging. See, Hyland, K., Hedging in scientific research articles. Pragmatics & beyond,1998, Amsterdam ; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Pub. Co. ix, 307 p. - Bob Futrelle BioNLP.org On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Oliver Ruebenacker <curoli@gmail.com>wrote: > Hello Anita, All, > > I'm mostly interested in numbers. Presumably, these statements have > been derived from numbers that can be found in these papers. The > challenge is to classify numbers and group them into systems and > states. Could your epistemic model help do that? > > Take care > Oliver > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Waard, Anita de A (ELS-NYC) > <A.dewaard@elsevier.com> wrote: > > All, > > > > I was struck by the phrase 'turning biological knowledge into > mathematical models' and wondering if anyone is interested to model > 'epistemic information' in biology articles, added to the knowledge of the > type that Oliver mentioned? > > > > In particular I am interested in modelling clauses such as 1 a., 2 a., 3 > a., and 3.b in the sentences below - I have a model to classify these and > would like to add this 'knowledge attribution' layer to existing > representations of triples in papers. > > > > 1 a. These studies have shown that > > 1.b. the 5' untranslated region (5'UTR) can be complex > > > > vs. > > > > 2. a. It has been reported that > > 2. b. 5' untranslated exons, and sometimes introns, can regulate the > expression of genes in two different ways. > > > > vs. > > > > 3. a. Thus, our analysis revealed areas of active chromatin remodeling > in the vicinity of exon 1 > > 3. b. suggesting that > > 3. c. this area may be important for CCR3 transcription. > > > > Is this part of the remit of this group and/or is anyone interested in > collaborating on this topic? > > > > Thanks, > > Best, > > > > - Anita. > > > > Anita de Waard > > Disruptive Technologies Director, Elsevier Labs > > http://elsatglabs.com/labs/anita/ > > a.dewaard@elsevier.com > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Oliver Ruebenacker [mailto:curoli@gmail.com] > > Sent: Fri 2/24/2012 11:55 > > To: Helena Deus; public-semweb-lifesci > > Subject: Re: Systems Biology Task Force Kick-Off - tomorrow (Feb 22) at > 11AM EDT > > > > > > Hello Helena, All, > > > > I'm interested in joining the Systems Biology Taskforce. Sorry I > > could not make the initial call. My interest is turning biological > > knowledge into mathematical models, automatically. A brief description > > is below. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Take care > > Oliver > > > > Living organisms are so enormously complex that we need computer > > simulations to understand the consequences of their vast biochemical > > reaction networks. As we uncover an increasing part of these networks, > > our established knowledge is increasingly stored in free web databases > > and available for query and download in machine-readable formats, > > especially in the RDF/OWL-based community standard Biological Pathways > > Exchange (BioPAX) [1]. The available data is massive and growing, e.g. > > Pathway Commons [2] stores 1,700 pathways, 414 organisms, 440,000 > > interactions and 86,000 substances. This data is fully linked with > > open controlled terminologies such as gene ontology (e.g. anatomical > > features) [3] and other free online databases such as ChEBI > > (chemicals) [4], KEGG (genes a.o.) [5], UniProt (proteins) [6] and > > PubMed (publications) [7]. > > > > Automatic use of this knowledge for computer simulations of > > biological organisms has been an ongoing challenge [8,9,10]. Now, > > Systems Biology Pathway Exchange (SBPAX) [11], a BioPAX extension, > > allows the inclusion of quantitative data and systems biology terms, > > especially the Systems Biology Ontology (SBO) [12]. SBPAX support has > > been implemented by the Virtual Cell [13], Signaling Gateway Molecule > > Pages [14] and System for the Analysis of Biochemical Pathways - > > Reaction Kinetics (SABIO-RK) [15]. For the first time, a mathematical > > model can be automatically built and fully annotated from a pathway of > > interest. > > > > Citations: > > > > [1] Biological Pathway Exchange (BioPAX), www.biopax.org > > [2] Pathway Commons, www.pathwaycommons.org > > [3] Gene Ontology (GO), www.geneontology.org/ > > [4] Chemical Entities of Biological Interest (ChEBI), > www.ebi.ac.uk/chebi/ > > [5] Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), > wwww.genome.jp/kegg/ > > [6] UniProt, www.uniprot.org > > [7] PubMed, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ > > [8] Modeling without Borders: Creating and Annotating VCell Models > > Using the Web, Michael L. Blinov, Oliver Ruebenacker, James C. Schaff > > and Ion I. Moraru, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2010, Volume > > 6053 (2010). > > [9] Using views of Systems Biology Cloud: application for model > > building, Oliver Ruebenacker, Michael Blinov, Theory in Biosciences, > > Volume 130, Number 1, 45-54 (2010). > > [10] Integrating BioPAX pathway knowledge with SBML models, Michael > > L Blinov, Oliver Ruebenacker, Ion I Moraru, IET Syst. Biol., 2009, > > Vol. 3, Iss. 5, pp. 317-328 (2009). > > [11] Systems Biology Pathway Exchange (SBPAX), www.sbpax.org > > [12] Systems Biology Ontology, www.ebi.ac.uk/sbo/main/ > > [13] Virtual Cell, http://vcell.org > > [14] Signaling Gateway Molecule Pages, > www.signaling-gateway.org/molecule/ > > [15] System for the Analysis of Biological Pathways - Reaction > > Kinetics (SABIO-RK), http://sabio.villa-bosch.de/ > > > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Helena Deus <helenadeus@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Dear All, > >> > >> Please join me tomorrow for the kick-off telco of the Systems Biology > Task > >> Force. Systems Biology is about looking at biological systems from an > >> integrated perspective and to use that perspective to understand > disease. We > >> will be discussing the general goals, strategy and structure of the task > >> force. > >> > >> Please see http://www.w3.org/wiki/HCLSIG/SysBio for an initial > motivation, > >> and description, of what this task will be focused on (with due > flexibility > >> according to participants input). > >> > >> > >> * Date of Call: Tuesday February 21, 2012 > >> * Time of Call: 11:00am Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) > >> * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA) > >> * [Note: limited access to European dial in numbers below] > >> * Dial-In #: +33.4.26.46.79.03 (Nice, France) > >> * Dial-In #: +44.203.318.0479 (Bristol, UK) > >> * Participant Access Code: 4257 ("HCLS"). > >> * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #HCLS > >> For instant IRC access: > >> see [http://www.w3.org/Project/IRC/ W3C IRC page] for details, or > >> see [http://cgi.w3.org/member-bin/irc/irc.cgi Web IRC]), Quick Start: > Click > >> on > >> [http://www.mibbit.com/chat/?server=irc.w3.org:6665&channel=%23hcls > mibbit] > >> > >> * Duration: ~1h > >> * Convener: Helena > >> * Scribe: TBD > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> Helena > > > > > > > > -- > > Oliver Ruebenacker, Computational Cell Biologist > > Virtual Cell (http://vcell.org) > > SBPAX: Turning Bio Knowledge into Math Models (http://www.sbpax.org) > > http://www.oliver.curiousworld.org > > > > > > Elsevier B.V. Registered Office: Radarweg 29, 1043 NX Amsterdam, The > Netherlands, Registration No. 33156677 (The Netherlands) > > > > > > -- > Oliver Ruebenacker, Computational Cell Biologist > Virtual Cell (http://vcell.org) > SBPAX: Turning Bio Knowledge into Math Models (http://www.sbpax.org) > http://www.oliver.curiousworld.org > >
Received on Friday, 24 February 2012 19:00:26 UTC