- From: Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>
- Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 14:50:40 +0100
- To: Michael Miller <Michael.Miller@systemsbiology.org>
- Cc: "Waard, Anita de A (ELS-AMS)" <A.dewaard@elsevier.com>, "M. Scott Marshall" <mscottmarshall@gmail.com>, Alexander Garcia Castro <alexgarciac@gmail.com>, barend mons <barend.mons@nbic.nl>, Tim Clark <tim_clark@harvard.edu>, HCLS IG <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, Alberto Accomazzi <aaccomazzi@cfa.harvard.edu>, Sophia Ananiadou <Sophia.Ananiadou@manchester.ac.uk>, Philip Bourne <bourne@sdsc.edu>, Gully Burns <gully@usc.edu>, "Daniel, Ronald (ELS-SDG)" <R.Daniel@elsevier.com>, Rahul Dave <rahuldave@gmail.com>, Alf Eaton <A.Eaton@nature.com>, Matthew Gamble <matthew.gamble@gmail.com>, Yolanda Gil <gil@isi.edu>, Alyssa Goodman <agoodman@cfa.harvard.edu>, Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>, Tudor Groza <tudor.groza@deri.org>, "Hays, Ellen (ELS-BUR)" <E.Hays@elsevier.com>, Maryann Martone <maryann@ncmir.ucsd.edu>, David R Newman <drn05r@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "Scerri, Antony (ELS-CAM)" <A.scerri@elsevier.com>, Jack Park <jackpark@gmail.com>, Silvio Peroni <speroni@cs.unibo.it>, Steve Pettifer <steve.pettifer@manchester.ac.uk>, Philippe Rocca-Serra <proccaserra@googlemail.com>, Cartic Ramakrishnan <cartic@isi.edu>, RebholzSchuhmann <d.rebholz.schuhmann@gmail.com>, David Shotton <david.shotton@zoo.ox.ac.uk>, Kaitlin Thaney <k.thaney@digital-science.com>, Karin Verspoor <Karin.Verspoor@ucdenver.edu>, Lynette Hirschman <lynette@mitre.org>, Susanna-Assunta Sansone <sa.sansone@gmail.com>, Kees van Bochove <business@keesvanbochove.nl>, Katy Wolstencroft <katy@cs.man.ac.uk>, Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>, Paul Groth <pgroth@few.vu.nl>, Marco Roos <M.Roos1@uva.nl>
- Message-Id: <39A6FD80-3271-44EC-8AF1-E57FD85A0419@deri.org>
Thanks for this, Michael. I've added it as context to our notes on these articles: http://www.w3.org/wiki/HCLSIG/SWANSIOC/Actions/RhetoricalStructure/meetings/20110502#1._BioRDF_Demonstrator: Can you tell me where you searched for this data? I'm not very familiar with this domain. -Jodi On 4 May 2011, at 16:47, Michael Miller wrote: > hi all, > > i did a quick search on the articles cited to find their associated data. > two of the articles (14 and 15) appear to be different takes on the same > data: > >> [13] Dunckley T, Beach TG, et al.. (2006). Gene expression correlates >> of neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol >> Aging;27:1359-71. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16242812 > GEO: GSE4757 ArrayExpress: E-GEOD-4757 > >> [14] Liang WS, Dunckley T, et al.. (2007). Gene expression profiles in >> anatomically and functionally distinct regions of the normal aged human >> brain. Physiol Genomics 28: 311-22. >> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18332434 > GEO: GSE5281(same as below) ArrayExpress: N/A > >> [15] Liang WS, Reiman EM, et al.. (2008). Alzheimer's disease is >> associated with reduced expression of energy metabolism genes in >> posterior cingulate neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A l2008;105: 4441- >> 6. >> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17077275 > GEO: GSE5281(same as above) ArrayExpress: N/A > > cheers, > michael > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org [mailto:public-semweb- >> lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Waard, Anita de A (ELS-AMS) >> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 1:46 PM >> To: M. Scott Marshall >> Cc: Alexander Garcia Castro; Jodi Schneider; barend mons; Tim Clark; >> HCLS IG; Alberto Accomazzi; Sophia Ananiadou; Philip Bourne; Gully >> Burns; Daniel, Ronald (ELS-SDG); Rahul Dave; Alf Eaton; Matthew Gamble; >> Yolanda Gil; Alyssa Goodman; Paul Groth; Tudor Groza; Hays, Ellen (ELS- >> BUR); Maryann Martone; David R Newman; Scerri, Antony (ELS-CAM); Jack >> Park; Silvio Peroni; Steve Pettifer; Philippe Rocca-Serra; Cartic >> Ramakrishnan; RebholzSchuhmann; David Shotton; Kaitlin Thaney; Karin >> Verspoor; Lynette Hirschman; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Kees van Bochove; >> Katy Wolstencroft; Jun Zhao; Paul Groth; Marco Roos >> Subject: RE: HCLS Scientific Discourse Call Monday, May 2nd, 10 am EST >> - minutes >> >> Dear Scott, all: >> >> We had a most productive call yesterday, largely echoing your thoughts, >> below. Two points were covered: a discussion of the BioRDF >> demonstrator, and a proposal to make a joint demonstrator - see also >> http://www.w3.org/wiki/HCLSIG/SWANSIOC/Actions/RhetoricalStructure/meet >> ings/20110502. >> >> 1. BioRDF Demonstrator: >> >> BioRDF group: http://www.w3.org/wiki/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup) >> Demo: http://biordfmicroarray.googlecode.com/hg/sparql_endpoint.html) >> Annotated corpus with triples: >> http://biordfmicroarray.googlecode.com/hg/all3_genelists_provenance.ttl >> >> Corpus: >> [13] Dunckley T, Beach TG, et al.. (2006). Gene expression correlates >> of neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol >> Aging;27:1359-71. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16242812 >> [14] Liang WS, Dunckley T, et al.. (2007). Gene expression profiles in >> anatomically and functionally distinct regions of the normal aged human >> brain. Physiol Genomics 28: 311-22. >> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18332434 >> [15] Liang WS, Reiman EM, et al.. (2008). Alzheimer's disease is >> associated with reduced expression of energy metabolism genes in >> posterior cingulate neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A l2008;105: 4441- >> 6. >> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17077275 >> >> Need help to automate: >> 1) Institution provenance and PIs etc. >> 2) Experimental context: what platform (e.g. microarray experiments - >> what company etc); disease patients have; where in the brain samples >> were collected, how far along was the disease when the sample was >> collected. >> 3) From this: generate list of genes, need details of statistical >> methods, what was algorithm etc. and analysis provenance etc. and >> confidence in statistical results >> >> Current use case: cancer; previous use case: Alzheimers >> >> 2. BioRDF-Scientific Discourse Joint Demonstrator proposal >> >> The scientific discourse group (in particular: Jodi, Anita and Paolo) >> will mark up the corpus that the BioRDF group has worked on. >> We will mark up these documents with >> a) ORB >> b) Annotation Ontology >> within the Harvard Annotation Framework, and link the BioRDF triples to >> specific locations in the text. >> >> This serves three purposes: >> 1) It allows the Scientific Discourse group to test if ORB + AO is >> enough to mark a given location in the document. If so - that concludes >> the deliverables of the subtask; if not, we need and will define a >> 'medium-grained' ontology. >> 2) It provides the BioRDF group with more detailed, location-linked >> annotations to their test corpus 3) This can help them in their quest >> to automate the mining of these triples >> >> After this markup is done, the evaluations will be: >> 1) Is ORB + AO enough? Is the SciDisc/Rhetorical structure group done? >> 2) Can this be a useful start towards automating the knowledge the >> BioRDF group wants to automate? >> >> If anyone from either group is interested in participating in this >> exercise, please let us know. >> >> >> Best, >> >> - Anita. >> >> Anita de Waard >> Disruptive Technologies Director, Elsevier Labs >> http://elsatglabs.com/labs/anita/ >> a.dewaard@elsevier.com >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: M. Scott Marshall [mailto:mscottmarshall@gmail.com] >> Sent: Mon 5/2/2011 9:51 >> To: Waard, Anita de A (ELS-AMS) >> Cc: Alexander Garcia Castro; Jodi Schneider; barend mons; Tim Clark; >> HCLS IG; Alberto Accomazzi; Sophia Ananiadou; Philip Bourne; Gully >> Burns; Daniel, Ronald (ELS-SDG); Rahul Dave; Alf Eaton; Matthew Gamble; >> Yolanda Gil; Alyssa Goodman; Paul Groth; Tudor Groza; Hays, Ellen (ELS- >> BUR); Maryann Martone; David R Newman; Scerri, Antony (ELS-CAM); Jack >> Park; Silvio Peroni; Steve Pettifer; Philippe Rocca-Serra; Cartic >> Ramakrishnan; RebholzSchuhmann; David Shotton; Kaitlin Thaney; Karin >> Verspoor; Lynette Hirschman; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Kees van Bochove; >> Katy Wolstencroft; Jun Zhao; Paul Groth; Marco Roos >> Subject: Re: HCLS Scientific Discourse Call Monday, May 2nd, 10 am EST >> - the real invite >> >> Regrets - have a meeting during that time. >> >> Addressing overlap with other task forces: at last year's C-SHALS, >> Tim, Kei, and I noticed some overlap in the RDF representation of >> experiments and started teleconferences in which BioRDF and SciDisc >> (Sudeshna Das) could stay coordinated. We are continuing that work in >> the form of a W3C note about RDF for expression studies (i.e. >> microarrays but not necessarily excluding other forms of expression >> data). We are hoping to find common (stable) ground for the W3C note >> by comparing / contrasting a number of existing approaches. We have >> presented our approaches in BioRDF telcons and a 'Metadata Capture' >> meeting in the Netherlands organized by Kees van Bochove. >> >> About ways to further combine across the overlaps: >> >> I see a lot of potential to combine approaches from the task forces by >> putting together several common elements (that already exist to some >> extent): >> >> * representation of provenance for text-mined assertions >> >> * representation of microarray experiment results in RDF with >> provenance information about the RDF itself, in addition to experiment >> provenance and RDF representation of experiment metadata >> >> A) performing microarray analysis in a workflow >> B) performing text mining in a workflow >> C) linking microarray analysis results with literature (linking RDF >> output from A & B) >> >> The above (A - C) combines a microarray experiment with a >> computational experiment (in the form of a workflow in which the >> analysis is done), which makes it important to clearly delineate >> different types of provenance - that of the microarray experiment, >> that of the workflow, and that of the RDF production. >> >> Perhaps there's a way to use a medium granularity markup of the >> microarray study article to enhance the literature mining, or use it >> together with the results RDF somehow. >> >> BTW, if one considers a nanopublication as a sort of prescribed >> provenance for a particular type of data, then you could consider the >> gene list (or each gene on it) to be a nanopublication. >> >> Cheers, >> Scott >> >> P.S. I had the above combination of ideas in mind for my presentation >> to SciDisc. Sorry to blurt it out without being able to stick around >> to explain what I mean. Maybe at the next telcon. >> >> P.P.S. There is a EU project Workflow4ever that has some common >> interests in the above. >> >> -- >> M. Scott Marshall, W3C HCLS IG co-chair, http://www.w3.org/blog/hcls >> http://staff.science.uva.nl/~marshall >> >> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Waard, Anita de A (ELS-AMS) >> <A.dewaard@elsevier.com> wrote: >>> Apologies for my confusing mail this weekend: obviously I'm not quite >> ready to send real emails from my iPhone! The goal was to discuss our >> conclusions from the April 18th meeting, which I copied below, and look >> back on our use cases and the work from other HCLS subgroups. >>> >>> Please find an improved version below or at >> //www.w3.org/wiki/HCLSIG/SWANSIOC/Actions/RhetoricalStructure/meetings/ >> 20110502. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> - Anita. >>> >>> Anita de Waard >>> Disruptive Technologies Director, Elsevier Labs >>> http://elsatglabs.com/labs/anita/ >>> a.dewaard@elsevier.com >>> >>> >> http://www.w3.org/wiki/HCLSIG/SWANSIOC/Actions/RhetoricalStructure/meet >> ings/20110502 >>> >>> Please join the HCLS Scientific Discourse concall on Monday, May 2 10 >> am EST, 3 pm BST, 7 am Pacific >>> >>> Agenda: >>> >>> 1) Timeframe and names for plans below >>> 2) How close are we to fulfilling our original use cases? >> (http://www.w3.org/wiki/HCLSIG/SWANSIOC/Actions/RhetoricalStructure/) >>> 3) Overlap with other HCLS subgroups (see >> http://www.w3.org/wiki/HCLSIG for a listing) >>> 4) Next steps. >>> >>> Conclusions meeting April 18: >>> >>> 1) Joint work on annotation a corpus of documents with links to >> workflow components and data. This will allow a concrete instantiation >> of the medium-grained ontology, and offer a discussion point for >> describing the experiment/paper link which we are approaching from many >> different sides. Alex Garcia will jumpstart this process by making a >> collection of full-text Elsevier documents available which he has >> annotated with RDF; after seeing these, we will select a subcorpus to >> mark up a) Data b) Experimental model c) Key discourse components from, >> and work to make a demonstrator. >>> >>> 2) A paper. Discussing our various models, and ways to integrate; >> include discussion re. overlap/difference between (explicit, personal) >> knowledge in discourse and (implicit, shared) knowledge that underlies >> experimental models. Could be possible outcome of demo. >>> >>> 3) A face-to-face meeting. Kees van Bochove has kindly agreed to >> organise this. Possible venues: ISMB in Vienna, ICBO in Buffalo, or a >> one-off workshop in the Netherlands. Topic: Experiment/discourse >> integration: models, examples, and next steps. >>> >>> >>> Dial-in & IRC Information >>> >>> * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA) >>> * Dial-In #: +33.4.26.46.79.03 (Paris, France) >>> * Dial-In #: +44.203.318.0479 (London, UK) >>> * Participant Access Code: 42572 ("HCLS2") >>> * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #HCLS2 use IRC direct >> link or (see W3C IRC page for details, or see Web IRC) >>> * Mibbit quick start: Click on mibbit for instant IRC access >>> * Duration: 1hr >>> Elsevier B.V. Registered Office: Radarweg 29, 1043 NX Amsterdam, The >> Netherlands, Registration No. 33156677 (The Netherlands) >>> >>> >> >> >> Elsevier B.V. Registered Office: Radarweg 29, 1043 NX Amsterdam, The >> Netherlands, Registration No. 33156677 (The Netherlands) >> >>
Received on Sunday, 8 May 2011 13:50:52 UTC