- From: Egon Willighagen <egon.willighagen@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 12:15:20 +0100
- To: Matthias Samwald <samwald@gmx.at>
- Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Hi Matthias, On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Matthias Samwald <samwald@gmx.at> wrote: > I'm not sure if clear-cut rules for LODD have been defined. However, many > people interested/involved in LODD come from commercially oriented companies > (mostly pharmaceutical companies). Therefore it certainly IS a reason for > concern if 5 out of 12 datasets disallow commercial use without permission. Agreed. It may also be relevant to all those research institutes that also have commercial activities, many of them who have mixed funding from national and EU projects, but also sell consultancy, etc. > It would certainly be helpful to convince these data providers of removing > the NC clause, but it seems unlikely. Indeed. This is why that latter was supposed to be informative, rather than requesting dropping that clause. At this moment, I am not aware that anyone has challenged a company for using data with a NC clause, but this is bound to happen. > Looking at the list of datasets with > NC clauses (including Drugbank, LinkedCT, major parts of SIDER, STITCH), I > get the feeling that the providers did not choose to include NC clauses on a > whim. Agreed. > I guess the best we can realistically do for these datasets is to > improve the visibility of these licensing restrictions for people that want > to use them. Yes, and that's an actual LODD activity we discussed about half a year ago, and which was the first half of the work done in the hack session: just getting clear what the actual terms of use are :) For three they are unclear, and we will seek clarification for those. That's the three letters being referred to in Jenny's email. Egon -- Dr E.L. Willighagen Postdoctoral Researcher Institutet för miljömedicin Karolinska Institutet Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/ LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2011 11:16:12 UTC