- From: Mark <markw@illuminae.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:59:03 -0700
- To: "Helena Deus" <helenadeus@gmail.com>
- Cc: linkedlifedatapracticesnote@googlegroups.com, Claus Stie Kallesøe <CSH@lundbeck.com>, HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, "Anja Jentzsch" <anja@anjeve.de>
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:06:47 -0700, Helena Deus <helenadeus@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I thought the drugs we two individuals (instances of drugs).
< :drugX rdf:type myshema:drug >
Here you are saying X is "type drug", asserting that "myschema:drug" is an
OWL Class. Therefore...
< myschema:drug owl:sameAs someother:drug >.
since we've already established that "myschema:drug" is a Class, then
someother:drug must also be a Class... and therefore you are now OWL Full.
> What would you recommend instead?
Make your drug class a subclass of the other drug class. You don't need
to put additional restrictions on it, just subclass it.
...there may be better options, but that's what works for me :-)
M
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2011 16:59:45 UTC