- From: Michael Miller <Michael.Miller@systemsbiology.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:03:42 -0700
- To: Helena Deus <helenadeus@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C HCLSIG hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <354eb8840cd2f01d3e93c812a73d0b7c@mail.gmail.com>
hi lena, after looking at wikipedia i see what you mean that it isn't a unit per se, it is a concentration of a solution, that is by definition a combination of a value of 1 with an SI unit of 1 mol\L. so it is certainly a property of the solution but i don't see how it is a datatype. in programming terms i define a variable to be of a certain datatype: int count = 5 what does it mean to say, Molar solution = ?? cheers, michael *From:* Helena Deus [mailto:helenadeus@gmail.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, August 16, 2011 3:17 PM *To:* Michael Miller *Cc:* Jim McCusker; Matthias Samwald; W3C HCLSIG hcls *Subject:* Re: "molar" for concentration Hi Michael, I did mean datatype. I do like the MUO / SI solution, but it's strange that they don't describe "Molar" (much more widely used) along with "mole"? Sure enough I can "build" a Molar, as Jim indicated... but I can also "build" a month or an acceleration from days or meters+time, and yet they provide it... Interesting... Thanks all, Cheers, Lena On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Michael Miller < Michael.Miller@systemsbiology.org> wrote: hi all, i did take a quick look at MUO and it does seem sane. "For instance, MUO has the ability to assert units of measure on n-ary observations, ..." and MUO appears based on SI. cheers, michael > -----Original Message----- > From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org [mailto:public-semweb- > lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jim McCusker > Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:58 PM > To: Matthias Samwald > Cc: Helena Deus; W3C HCLSIG hcls > Subject: Re: "molar" for concentration > > In general, you really want to be able to have additional levels of > qualification. For instance, MUO has the ability to assert units of > measure on n-ary observations, as well as to provide prefUnit > annotations on properties. An ontology that generates property URIs > for every quality and unit of measure would be huge and very > cumbersome, and I think the consensus is to annotate your own > properties with units of measure. > > Jim > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Matthias Samwald > <matthias.samwald@meduniwien.ac.at> wrote: > > Besides the ontologies already mentioned, the unit ontology / > > UO (http://obofoundry.org/cgi-bin/detail.cgi?id=unit) also has a > class for > > "mole" and one for "molar mass unit". But you actually wanted a URI > for a > > datatype so this (as well as the other ontologies mentioned before) > is > > probably not what you wanted. > > > > Does anybody know of an ontology that defines scientific datatypes in > OWL 2? > > > > - Matthias > > > > From: Helena Deus > > Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 5:23 PM > > To: W3C HCLSIG hcls > > Subject: "molar" for concentration > > Hi all, > > Wondering if anyone ever needed/came across a URI for datatype "M" > (molar, > > as in 10 M -> 10 Molar). > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molar_concentration > > > > Cheers, > > -- > > Helena F. Deus > > Post-Doctoral Researcher at DERI/NUIG > > http://lenadeus.info/ > > > > > > -- > Jim McCusker > Programmer Analyst > Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics > Yale School of Medicine > james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-6330 > http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu > > PhD Student > Tetherless World Constellation > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute > mccusj@cs.rpi.edu > http://tw.rpi.edu -- Helena F. Deus Post-Doctoral Researcher at DERI/NUIG http://lenadeus.info/
Received on Wednesday, 17 August 2011 15:04:11 UTC