- From: Helena Deus <helenadeus@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 23:16:57 +0100
- To: Michael Miller <Michael.Miller@systemsbiology.org>
- Cc: Jim McCusker <james.mccusker@yale.edu>, Matthias Samwald <matthias.samwald@meduniwien.ac.at>, W3C HCLSIG hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPkJ_9kijt0PMf1iwR2CoKCMELqgKsTXVJxEyJbC04M0=09JqA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Michael, I did mean datatype. I do like the MUO / SI solution, but it's strange that they don't describe "Molar" (much more widely used) along with "mole"? Sure enough I can "build" a Molar, as Jim indicated... but I can also "build" a month or an acceleration from days or meters+time, and yet they provide it... Interesting... Thanks all, Cheers, Lena On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Michael Miller < Michael.Miller@systemsbiology.org> wrote: > hi all, > > i did take a quick look at MUO and it does seem sane. > > "For instance, MUO has the ability to assert units of measure on n-ary > observations, ..." > > and MUO appears based on SI. > > cheers, > michael > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org [mailto:public-semweb- > > lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jim McCusker > > Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:58 PM > > To: Matthias Samwald > > Cc: Helena Deus; W3C HCLSIG hcls > > Subject: Re: "molar" for concentration > > > > In general, you really want to be able to have additional levels of > > qualification. For instance, MUO has the ability to assert units of > > measure on n-ary observations, as well as to provide prefUnit > > annotations on properties. An ontology that generates property URIs > > for every quality and unit of measure would be huge and very > > cumbersome, and I think the consensus is to annotate your own > > properties with units of measure. > > > > Jim > > > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Matthias Samwald > > <matthias.samwald@meduniwien.ac.at> wrote: > > > Besides the ontologies already mentioned, the unit ontology / > > > UO (http://obofoundry.org/cgi-bin/detail.cgi?id=unit) also has a > > class for > > > "mole" and one for "molar mass unit". But you actually wanted a URI > > for a > > > datatype so this (as well as the other ontologies mentioned before) > > is > > > probably not what you wanted. > > > > > > Does anybody know of an ontology that defines scientific datatypes in > > OWL 2? > > > > > > - Matthias > > > > > > From: Helena Deus > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 5:23 PM > > > To: W3C HCLSIG hcls > > > Subject: "molar" for concentration > > > Hi all, > > > Wondering if anyone ever needed/came across a URI for datatype "M" > > (molar, > > > as in 10 M -> 10 Molar). > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molar_concentration > > > > > > Cheers, > > > -- > > > Helena F. Deus > > > Post-Doctoral Researcher at DERI/NUIG > > > http://lenadeus.info/ > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Jim McCusker > > Programmer Analyst > > Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics > > Yale School of Medicine > > james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-6330 > > http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu > > > > PhD Student > > Tetherless World Constellation > > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute > > mccusj@cs.rpi.edu > > http://tw.rpi.edu > -- Helena F. Deus Post-Doctoral Researcher at DERI/NUIG http://lenadeus.info/
Received on Tuesday, 16 August 2011 22:17:48 UTC