- From: mdmiller <mdmiller53@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 10:55:48 -0700
- To: "M. Scott Marshall" <marshall@science.uva.nl>
- Cc: "HCLS" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
hi scott, i think you, jim and lena are doing a great job moving the technical aspect of this work forward. i'm looking forward to seeing the end results. cheers, michael ----- Original Message ----- From: "M. Scott Marshall" <marshall@science.uva.nl> To: "mdmiller" <mdmiller53@comcast.net> Cc: "Kei Cheung" <kei.cheung@yale.edu>; "HCLS" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 10:21 AM Subject: Re: BioRDF Telcon > Hi Michael, > > Thanks for the clarification. I also explained those concepts during > the BioRDF teleconference but it is difficult for the scribe to > capture such details accurately from a phone conversation. Just > knowing that a gene has changed (either up or down) already gives us > something to work with. Since we started with the microarray use case, > we have aimed to focus on the list of differentially expressed genes > as our entry point into related molecular information, phenotypes, > pathways, diseases, etc. > > In addition to the gene list and experimental factors, there is some > data provenance information that characterizes the origins of the gene > list, such as the type of significant analysis or technique that was > performed (ANOVA, LIMMA, ..) and p-value cutoff for the list discussed > in the associated article(s), software packages used (specific R > package from BioConductor, GeneSpring, NextBio, ..). It would be handy > if there was a common vocabulary for this type of information (URI's > for statistical techniques and software packages). I think that some > related resources have been described by myGrid/myExperiment. However, > lacking a complete vocabulary, it is still possible to make use of the > gene list without such a fine grained description of its provenance. > > Cheers, > Scott > > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:35 AM, mdmiller <mdmiller53@comcast.net> wrote: >> hi all, >> >> sorry i ended up not being able to make the call. >> >> "P value >> The probability (ranging from zero to one) that the results observed in a >> study could have occurred by chance if the null hypothesis was true. A P >> value of ? 0.05 is often used as a threshold to indicate statistical >> significance." (1) >> >> the exact meaning of p-value depends on what is being measured. >> >> also, sometimes it isn't so important that a gene is up or down regulated >> but whether its expression changes from up or down regulated over the >> experimental factors, e.g. if you increase the dose of the drug do the >> target genes go from non-expressed to up regulated. >> >> cheers, >> michael >> >> 1) >> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bookshelf/br.fcgi?book=antiepi&part=appendixes.app2 >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kei Cheung" <kei.cheung@yale.edu> >> To: "HCLS" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> >> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 11:40 AM >> Subject: Re: BioRDF Telcon >> >> >>> Today's minutes are available at: >>> >>> >>> http://esw.w3.org/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Meetings/2010/05-24_Conference_Call >>> >>> Thanks to Matthias for scribing. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> -Kei >>> >>> mdmiller wrote: >>>> >>>> hi kei, >>>> >>>> look forward to joining the call, >>>> michael >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kei Cheung" <kei.cheung@yale.edu> >>>> To: "mdmiller" <mdmiller53@comcast.net>; "HCLS" >>>> <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> >>>> Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2010 12:10 PM >>>> Subject: Re: BioRDF Telcon >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi Michael, >>>>> >>>>> Yes, May 24 was what I meant. It was a typo. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> -Kei >>>>> >>>>> mdmiller wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> hi kei, >>>>>> >>>>>> do you mean monday (may 24)? >>>>>> >>>>>> cheers, >>>>>> michael >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kei Cheung" <kei.cheung@yale.edu> >>>>>> To: "JunZhao" <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk> >>>>>> Cc: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> >>>>>> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 2:28 PM >>>>>> Subject: Re: BioRDF Telcon >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Since there were only Jun and Scott who attended the last BioRDF >>>>>>> call >>>>>>> (I was not able to attend due to some emergency meetings), we >>>>>>> decided to >>>>>>> have the next BioRDF call on the coming Monday (May 21) at 11 am >>>>>>> (EDT). The >>>>>>> agenda will be the same (see below). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Kei >>>>>>> >>>>>>> JunZhao wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is a reminder that the next BioRDF telcon call will be held at >>>>>>>> 11 >>>>>>>> am EDT (4 pm CET) on Monday, May 17 (see details below). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Jun >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> == Conference Details == >>>>>>>> * Date of Call: Monday, May 17, 2010 >>>>>>>> * Time of Call: 11:00 am Eastern Time (4 pm CET) >>>>>>>> * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA) >>>>>>>> * Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France) >>>>>>>> * Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK) >>>>>>>> * Participant Access Code: 4257 ("HCLS") >>>>>>>> * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #HCLS (see W3C IRC page >>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>> details, or see Web IRC), Quick Start: Use >>>>>>>> http://www.mibbit.com/chat/?server=irc.w3.org:6665&channel=%23hcls >>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>> IRC access. >>>>>>>> * Duration: ~1 hour >>>>>>>> * Frequency: bi-weekly >>>>>>>> * Convener: Jun >>>>>>>> * Scribe: to-be-determined >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ==Agenda== >>>>>>>> * Introduction >>>>>>>> * Gene list RDF representation >>>>>>>> * iPhone demo >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 25 May 2010 17:56:43 UTC