- From: Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:16:49 +1000
- To: ctaswell@telegenetics.net
- Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
On 22 June 2010 02:30, Carl Taswell <ctaswell@telegenetics.net> wrote: > > The paper entitled “A Distributed Infrastructure for Metadata about Metadata: The HDMM Architectural Style and PORTAL-DOORS System” has been published in 2010 Future Internet 2(2):156-189. > > > > Future Internet is an Open Access journal, and the paper is available for download at > > > > http://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/2/2/156/ > > > > Questions, comments, suggestions and criticisms always appreciated…. > Sounds very interesting. I don't think I have it fully understood at this point, but I am just wondering about a few points right now. You say on page 171 that "All labels, whether canonical or alias, for all resources must always be globally unique throughout the system. Thus the original design requirement for uniqueness of labels has not been violated by this revision." I am wondering how a heirarchical distributed system manages to ensure this requirement is met. If I say that the canonical identifier for something is <myuri> and someone else says it is <theiruri> how does the system negotiate this? Do the registries have to be connected before the second URI is assigned? Is there a long startup time for adding new registries and new resources where everyone has to relearn everything about everyone else to make sure things are still consistent? You say in the scenario that different scientists should be free to independently say things about the same thing. Does that thing have to be given a label by a single and final authority initially or could the system gradually learn what the preferred resource label is? Also, what are the approximate number of resources that you were managing in your trial, and how many aliases were used for each resource on average? Cheers, Peter
Received on Monday, 21 June 2010 23:17:22 UTC