- From: M. Scott Marshall <mscottmarshall@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 10:01:22 -0700
- To: HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
The minutes from this morning's LODD teleconference are here: http://www.w3.org/2010/06/09-hcls-minutes.html Thanks to Egon Willighagen for scribing! A few things worth noting: Provenance as a best practice for LODD? Certain types of information about the origins of the RDF and the information that it represents would be generally useful to those who would use it. It would also be helpful if such provenance were machine-readable. For example, a "SRC" is given for http://link.informatics.stonybrook.edu/rxnorm/RXAUI/687117 as "J Pharm Biomed Anal 1995 Feb;13(2):155-8". http://sharednames.org is planning to create PURLS for PubMed that could be useful here. Other types of provenance could include: license, linked data author, linked data software, linked data creation date, src version, etc. Ideally, we could refer to most provenance information with a URI from a Shared Identifier system. Cheers, Scott
Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2010 17:01:50 UTC