- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 04:33:58 +0100
- To: Joanne Luciano <jluciano@gmail.com>
- Cc: Davide Zaccagnini <davide@landcglobal.com>, Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>, Andrea Splendiani <andrea.splendiani@bbsrc.ac.uk>, John Madden <john.madden@duke.edu>, w3c semweb HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
On 2 February 2010 04:30, Joanne Luciano <jluciano@gmail.com> wrote: >>> . I suppose what I'm saying is we have to allow for ignorance >>> in these systems, which is virtually impossible to express, even in >>> OWL. > > > Ignorance can be expressed in at least 2 ways in OWL... Disclaimer: this is > off the top of my head and it is late ... > > 1, Open world assumption > 2, Granularity - meaning you only encode to the level you are not ignorant > about, > > Joanne very good. the killer is the open world. granularity means hard work for someone. -- http://danny.ayers.name
Received on Tuesday, 2 February 2010 03:34:32 UTC