It could be based on OpenEHR and ontologies too, like this: www.hst.aau.dk/~ska/MIE2009/papers/MIE2009p0953.pdf<http://www.hst.aau.dk/~ska/MIE2009/papers/MIE2009p0953.pdf> http://www.serefarikan.com/?p=97 - Dave From: Jim McCusker [mailto:james.mccusker@yale.edu] Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 5:09 PM To: Matthias Löbe Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org Subject: Re: An Universal Exchange Language 2010/12/14 Matthias Löbe <matthias.loebe@imise.uni-leipzig.de<mailto:matthias.loebe@imise.uni-leipzig.de>> Hello to all, A central point is to create an "Universal Exchange Language" that is architecturally neutral, XML-based, extensible, optimized for representing structured data, and that should have the ability to include/ reference controlled vocabularies. That language would be used to design fine-grained data elements that could be tagged with metadata. These data elements should be modular, reusable, interlinked and should not be tied to a specific context. Like it or not, they were probably thinking of HL7 and ISO 21090. We would need to show how semweb solutions are a better solution, or how it is tied too much to healthcare, leaving out life sciences, population science, chemistry, etc. We don't yet have *a* solution for this, we have several. :-) Jim -- Jim McCusker Programmer Analyst Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics Yale School of Medicine james.mccusker@yale.edu<mailto:james.mccusker@yale.edu> | (203) 785-6330 http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu PhD Student Tetherless World Constellation Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute mccusj@cs.rpi.edu<mailto:mccusj@cs.rpi.edu> http://tw.rpi.edu
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 2010 22:20:08 UTC