- From: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:24:58 +0100
- To: pedantic-web@googlegroups.com
- Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Hi Simon, On 23 Oct 2009, at 19:05, Simon Reinhardt wrote: > > Hello, > > I have some corrections and remarks on the new HCLS notes [1][2] as > well as the SWAN ontology. > > First of all the Turtle code has some errors in both of the > documents. The prefixes at the beginning of each block are defined > in SPARQL syntax ("PREFIX blah: <uri...>") however the syntax for > Turtle is different. It should be "@prefix blah: > <uri...> ." (trailing dot!). Thanks, well spotted. I fixed that in svn, I'll see if the W3C team if the published note can be updated. > Then in [2], section 5.2 you write URIs as literals several times. > This happens with the predicates > swanci:contributionPublicationEnvironment, > swanci:contributionPublisher, swanpav:importedFromSource, > swanci:publishedBy and owl:sameAs. And inspecting the SWAN > ontologies all those are object properties, so the values really > shouldn't be literals. I fixed that as well - will also check for republishing. > Also this document randomly switches to RDF/XML for one block of > syntax in section 6 while the next block below is Turtle again. Any > particular reason for that? I think that's rather confusing for the > reader. > > Concerning the SWAN ontologies themselves I noticed that the > namespaces stated in [2], section 1.3, don't resolve to anything. I > would expect that when accessing those URIs I get redirected to the > particular ontology document (and, since you use namespace URIs > ending in / I would also expect any term URI built from that to > redirect to its ontology). Instead they redirect to URIs like http://swan.mindinformatics.org/ontologies/1.2/discourse-elements/ > which return a 404. We were indeed aware of that, and asked the sysadmin to fix it. Paolo, do you know the current status of the redirect ? > Going through the SWAN ontology site [3] I can reach the OWL files, > however when inspecting them I notice that they don't actually use > the PURL namespaces from [2]. Instead they use the URIs those > redirect to directly - so all URIs of the terms defined in there > don't match the URIs of the terms in the W3C document. The HTML > specs provided on the SWAN site also declare those to be the > namespace URIs and not the PURL ones. > Finally, all OWL documents appear to be served with MIME type text/ > xml instead of application/rdf+xml so RDF or OWL tools might not > recognise them properly. Might be also something that can be fixed by the sysadmins from the swan server ? Best, Alex. > > Regards, > Simon Reinhardt > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/NOTE-hcls-sioc-20091020/ > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/NOTE-hcls-swan-20091020/ > [3] http://swan.mindinformatics.org/ontology.html -- Dr. Alexandre Passant Digital Enterprise Research Institute National University of Ireland, Galway :me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> .
Received on Friday, 23 October 2009 19:25:34 UTC