- From: andrea splendiani \(RRes-Roth\) <andrea.splendiani@bbsrc.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:17:39 -0000
- To: "Chris Mungall" <cjm@berkeleybop.org>
- Cc: "public-semweb-lifesci hcls" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Thanks! It'2 240M, but compressed is only 9. I wonder whether there is some architecture to transparently transfer compressed ontologies... Ciao, Andrea -----Original Message----- From: Chris Mungall [mailto:cjm@berkeleybop.org] Sent: 25 February 2009 20:53 To: andrea splendiani (RRes-Roth) Cc: public-semweb-lifesci hcls Subject: Re: Is there an NCBI taxonomy in OWL ? On Feb 25, 2009, at 11:58 AM, Andrea Splendiani wrote: > Hi, > > I was looking for an NCBI Taxnomoy in OWL, but I didn't find it (or > better, could find fragment from other projects...) > > What is strange though, is that on the obo foundry website > (berkeleybop.org/ontologies) there are notes on the ncbi taxonomy > representation in owl... but not the representation itself. Temporarily dropped from the summary page but still available at the usual URL http://purl.org/obo/owl/NCBITaxon (warning: large..) > Does anybody have some hint about where I can fin an OWL version ? > Or even an RDF version ? Even better would a sparql endpoint > containing it... > > best, > Andrea Splendiani > > >
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2009 00:18:24 UTC