- From: Luciano, Joanne S. <jluciano@mitre.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:05:06 -0500
- To: "Kei Cheung" <kei.cheung@yale.edu>, "Maged N.K. Boulos" <mnkboulos@gmail.com>
- Cc: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
This is the Wikipedia data: Age Incidence (new affected) per thousand person–years 65–69 3 70–74 6 75–79 9 80–84 23 85–89 40 90– 69 This is the Vispedia output. I haven't had time to retrace the construction ... or to try it myself, but there appears to be a discrepancy. This may be a browser issue too, I'm in Firefox. What's coming out is a plot with (x,y) as follows: (3,3) (6, 6) (9,9) (23,23) (40,40) Here's a paste: X [ Age ] Y [ Incidence (new affected) per thousand personâÃÂÃÂyears ] Age: 65–69 → Age: 0 → Incidence (new affected) per thousand person–years: 3.03.0 Incidence (new affected) per thousand person–years: 3.03.0 Age: 70–74 → Age: 1 → Incidence (new affected) per thousand person–years: 6.06.0 Incidence (new affected) per thousand person–years: 6.06.0 Age: 75–79 → Age: 2 → Incidence (new affected) per thousand person–years: 9.09.0 Incidence (new affected) per thousand person–years: 9.09.0 Age: 80–84 → Age: 3 → Incidence (new affected) per thousand person–years: 23.023.0 Incidence (new affected) per thousand person–years: 23.023.0 Age: 85–89 → Age: 4 → Incidence (new affected) per thousand person–years: 40.040.0 Incidence (new affected) per thousand person–years: 40.040.0 Age: 90– → Age: 5 → Incidence (new affected) per thousand person–years: 69.069.0 Sorry I wasn't able to take the time to provide more answers than questions.... Joanne >-----Original Message----- >From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org [mailto:public-semweb- >lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Kei Cheung >Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 10:31 PM >To: Maged N.K. Boulos >Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org >Subject: Re: Vispedia: Interactive Visual Exploration of Wikipedia Data >via Search-Based Integration > > >Hi Maged, > >Thanks for sharing the paper. It's very interesting work incorporating >analysis and visualization into wiki. I also found the following demo >video: > >http://graphics.stanford.edu/projects/vispedia/vispedia-trailer-tr.mov > >Just for fun, I searched for "Alzheimer" in Wikipedia and it brought me >to the Alzeihmer's disease page. In the Epidemiology section, there is a >table listing AD incidence rates after 65 years of age. I used vispedia >to visualize this table and create the following scatter plot: > >http://vispedia.stanford.edu/vis/353/Scatterplot#/?cp0=0&f0=Age&cp1=0& f1 >=Incidence%20(new%20affected)%20%20per%20thousand%20%20person%C3%A2%C2 %8 >0%C2%93years&cp2=0&f2=&cp3=0&f3=&cp4=0&f4= > >Cheers, > >-Kei > >Maged N.K. Boulos wrote: > >> Given the recent interests of some members of this list in Wiki >> applications like WikiNeuron and novel information visualization >> techniques, this paper might prove useful and inspiring: >> Chan B, Wu L, Talbot J, Cammarano M, Hanrahan P. >> ><http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18988966?ordinalpos=1&itool=Entrez Sy >stem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pub me >d_RVDocSum> >> >> *Vispedia: Interactive Visual Exploration of Wikipedia Data via >> Search-Based Integration*. >> /IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph/. 2008 November-December;14(6):1213-1220. >> >> Stanford University. >> >> Wikipedia is an example of the collaborative, semi-structured data >> sets emerging on the Web. These data sets have large, non-uniform >> schema that require costly data integration into structured tables >> before visualization can begin. We present Vispedia, a Web-based >> visualization system that reduces the cost of this data >> integration.
Users can browse Wikipedia, select an interesting >> data table, then use a search interface to discover, integrate, and >> visualize additional columns of data drawn from multiple Wikipedia >> articles. This interaction is supported by a fast path search >> algorithm over DBpedia, a semantic graph extracted from Wikipedia's >> hyperlink structure. Vispedia can also export the augmented data >> tables produced for use in traditional visualization systems. We >> believe that these techniques begin to address the "long tail" of >> visualization by allowing a wider audience to visualize a broader >> class of data. We evaluated this system in a first-use formative lab >> study. Study participants were able to quickly create effective >> visualizations for a diverse set of domains, performing data >> integration as needed.
 >> >> PMID: 18988966 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] >> >
Received on Monday, 10 November 2008 15:06:15 UTC