- From: Samson Tu <swt@stanford.edu>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:54:59 -0800
- To: "Kashyap, Vipul" <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>
- Cc: <helen.chen@agfa.com>, <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, <public-hcls-coi@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <B32EBA27-B4EA-49C9-AAA7-BD4858827F7B@stanford.edu>
Vipul, I was responding to Helen's request for information about "a good ontology version of RIM/CDA" I think Alan Rector's paper is still relevant to your use case. My understanding is that, in his view, HL7/RIM/CDA are *information model* constructs that use *terminology codes* that are induced/have bindings from ontology or *model of reality" things. So if you are modeling eligibility criteria using HL7RIM/CDA, most of the items in your spreadsheets are terminology codes, not entities in an ontology. There are so many ways to model eligibility criteria. I am not sure I understand "filling this table with HL7/RIM/CDA constructs." The RIM Acts have criterion mood. So an eligibility criterion involving "Serum Creatine," for example, can be an Observation Act in criterion mood with code = a terminology code for Serum Creatinine and value = an interval of Physical Quantity (and maybe effectiveTime to express temporal constraint. Presumably Tom Marley's OWL ITS of the HL7 RIM would give you such a RIM construct the criterion in OWL syntax. (Alternatively, you can use GELLO to write the criterion). Using OWL expressions to model eligibility criteria is another matter. I apologize if these comments reflect my ignorance about what you are doing. I am not familiar with prior discussions about the spreadsheet. Samson On Jan 16, 2008, at 8:18 PM, Kashyap, Vipul wrote: > Samson, > > Thanks for the pointer. Our use case is different, we are more > interested in using HL7/RIM constructs > to model eligibility criteria for some diabetes related clinical > protocols. > > An initial attempt at doing this is available at: > http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/ClinicalObservationsInteroperability/RIMRDFOWL?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=ModelingConstructsForDiabetesData.xls > It will be great if you could help us in filling out this table > using HL7/RIM/CDA constructs. > > Thanks! > > ---Vipul > > > From: Samson Tu [mailto:swt@stanford.edu] > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 4:57 PM > To: helen.chen@agfa.com > Cc: Kashyap, Vipul; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > Subject: Re: [COI] Clinical Observations Interoperability Telcon > January 15 2008 > > Tom Marley and Alan Rector, under a consultancy contract with NHS > CfH, have successfully encoded a significant subset of HL7 RIM and > NHS messages and message fragments in OWL. According to [1], Tom > Marley is preparing an OWL ITS of the HL7 RIM and data types based > on this work. A conference paper describing this work generically is > available at [2]. > > [1] http://detailedclinicalmodels.org/wiki/index.php?title=Model_Formalism#OWL > [2] http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/%7Erector/papers/krmed2006-rector-binding-ontologies-to-ehrs.pdf > > Samson > > helen.chen@agfa.com wrote: >> >> >> Vipul and all >> >> Sorry I will not be able to dial in today due to a time conflict. >> >> I started to put up a wiki to examine some previous effort on >> converting RIM/CDA to RDF/OWL for semantic web reasoning. The >> page is here >> >> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/ClinicalObservationsInteroperability/HL7CDA2OWL.html?action=show >> >> I will add more content later this afternoon. Please feel free to >> add links if you know a good ontology version of RIM/CDA. >> >> Regards. >> >> Helen >> > > -- > Samson Tu email: swt@stanford.edu > Senior Research Scientist web: www.stanford.edu/ > ~swt/ > Center for Biomedical Informatics Research phone: 1-650-725-3391 > Stanford University fax: 1-650-725-7944 > The information transmitted in this electronic communication is > intended only > for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain > confidential > and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, > dissemination or other > use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by > persons or > entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you > received this > information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at > 800-856-1983 and > properly dispose of this information. > >
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2008 17:55:32 UTC