- From: Kei Cheung <kei.cheung@yale.edu>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:27:16 -0400
- To: Matthias Samwald <samwald@gmx.at>
- CC: public-semweb-lifesci <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Matthias Samwald wrote: > > Kei Cheung wrote: > >> Also, it's interesting to see scientific workflows can be published >> via Wiki (e.g., myExperiment). > > > But as far as I know, myExperiment does not allow editing the actual > workflows online, you can only upload and visualize workflow files > that have been created on the client-side. I guess that still poses a > significant hindrance to realizing the 'anyone can edit' philosophy of > classic wikis. In this regard, fully server-sided systems such as the > well known Yahoo Pipes or the quickly maturing Semantic Web Pipes [1] > might be the way to go. > > Regarding the article, it will probably seem a bit puzzling to many > people on this mailing list that Lincoln Stein writes > > "To my knowledge, there is currently only one project that aims to > bring the pure semantic web to biomedical research. That project is > the Simple Semantic Web Architecture and Protocol (SSWAP30)" > > It's nice that Nature allows the community to add descriptions about > our various projects on the wiki page associated with the article [2]; > unfortunately, though, most readers of the original article will > probably not have a look at that wiki. Nature seems to allow one to write correspondence (1 page) to comment about matters arising from research papers. See: http://www.nature.com/ng/pdf/gta.pdf This might be a way a get a Nature publication :-) . Cheers, -Kei > > [1] http://pipes.deri.org/ > [2] http://nrgwiki.nature.com/cyberinfrastructureforbiology/show/HomePage > > Cheers, > Matthias Samwald > DERI Galway, Ireland // Semantic Web Company, Vienna > >
Received on Wednesday, 20 August 2008 13:28:05 UTC