W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Banff demo - and pending Soc. for Neuro abstract (due: 5/17 - Thu)

From: <jbarkley@nist.gov>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 09:53:30 -0400
Message-ID: <1179064410.4647185ad6c42@webmail.nist.gov>
To: William Bug <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>


hi bill,

> to the doc.  Anyone wishing to participate, please don't hesitate to  
> ask to be added to the list of collaborators.  All you need to do is  
> pass on an active Google account email, and any one of us can add you  
> as a collaborator.  

Please add me as a collaborator. My google account is jbarkley@nist.gov
I have also requested access via google.

thanks,

jb  



Date:  Sun, 13 May 2007 01:07:36 -0400 
From:  William Bug <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu> 
To:  public-semweb-lifesci hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> 
Subject:  Re: Banff demo - and pending Soc. for Neuro abstract (due: 5/17 - 
Thu) 

Quoting William Bug <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>:

> Woohoo!!!
> 
> I wish I knew that last week when filing a grant progress report.  ;-)
> 
> But seriously Kei, that's wonderful news.
> 
> To jump on the momentum bandwagon, on Don's request, I've distilled  
> the Banff presentations and written a SfN abstract (due this Thu)  
> combining that as best I could with a summary of what Matthias & Don  
> had written already.
> 
> SfN abstract limits are measured in characters (2300 chars - minus  
> white space) - but including title, abstract, authors, and address.   
> This current summary at the top of the Google Doc we'd been nurturing  
> through last week (http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dgk2mvhp_0fmftbb) is  
> now up to ~3800 chars without authors and addresses (NOTE: citations  
> are not necessary, nor are they typical for SfN abstract submissions).
> 
> Right now, Don, Matthias, Alan, Susie, and I all have access rights  
> to the doc.  Anyone wishing to participate, please don't hesitate to  
> ask to be added to the list of collaborators.  All you need to do is  
> pass on an active Google account email, and any one of us can add you  
> as a collaborator.  If you don't want "write" access but only want to  
> read what's there, you can be added as a 'viewer'.  They've also  
> recently added the ability to add all the members of a mailing list  
> as collaborators or viewers (up to 200 people - and only 10 can edit  
> simultaneously - see http://docs.google.com/support/bin/answer.py? 
> answer=66343&topic=8628)
> 
> Hopefully, this summary abstract can provide a final high-water mark  
> from which over the next few days we can distill a trimmed abstract  
> coming in under the wire.
> 
> To be honest, I think we have enough here for 2 SfN submissions - but  
> I'm not certain yet how to split it - or whether we should just trim  
> it to one.  We'd also need a second SfN member/sponsor to be first  
> author beyond what Don has committed to do for this abstract.  I'm  
> committed on another abstract, and you can only be "presenting"/first  
> author on one abstract.  "Presenting"/first authors must be SfN full  
> or student members.
> 
> We should also give some thought as to which sessions we'd want to  
> submit to, and whether we'd want to request to give a talk or a  
> poster.  The typical thing when you have >1 submission on a related  
> research effort is to have one of each.
> 
> Congratulations again to all - both on the successful Banff demo,  
> Banff HCLS session, and the actual publication of the BMC manuscript!
> 
> Cheers,
> Bill
> 
> 
> On May 12, 2007, at 3:41 PM, Kei Cheung wrote:
> 
> > Adding to the milestones, the SWHCLS paper was just officially  
> > published in the special issue "Semantic e-Science in Biomedicine"  
> > of BMC Bioinformatics.  See the URL below.
> >
> > http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/S3/S2
> >
> > Let's keep the momentum going!
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > -Kei
> >
> > William Bug wrote:
> >
> >> Vunderbar!
> >>
> >> Thanks to all who worked hard to pull this off!
> >>
> >> It's hard to get the full impact just perusing the slides, but it  
> >> looks to me that you pulled together a very compelling demo that  
> >> examined several questions of biological relevance to  
> >> neuroscientists studying neurodegenerative disease (AD in  
> >> particular).
> >>
> >> I also really like the list breakdown of tools to target different  
> >> aspects of the overall development - e.g., Pellet, Jena, Perfuse,  
> >> etc.
> >>
> >> I think this will be a fantastic base to build off for ISMB (and  
> >> SfN).
> >>
> >> Kudos!
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Bill
> >>
> >> On May 11, 2007, at 2:18 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I have updated the page http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/ 
> >>> Banff2007Demo with slides, pointers to the triple store etc.
> >>>
> >>> -Alan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Bill Bug
> >> Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer
> >>
> >> Laboratory for Bioimaging  & Anatomical Informatics
> >> www.neuroterrain.org
> >> Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy
> >> Drexel University College of Medicine
> >> 2900 Queen Lane
> >> Philadelphia, PA    19129
> >> 215 991 8430 (ph)
> >> 610 457 0443 (mobile)
> >> 215 843 9367 (fax)
> >>
> >>
> >> Please Note: I now have a new email - William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu  
> >> <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> Bill Bug
> Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer
> 
> Laboratory for Bioimaging  & Anatomical Informatics
> www.neuroterrain.org
> Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy
> Drexel University College of Medicine
> 2900 Queen Lane
> Philadelphia, PA    19129
> 215 991 8430 (ph)
> 610 457 0443 (mobile)
> 215 843 9367 (fax)
> 
> 
> Please Note: I now have a new email - William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Sunday, 13 May 2007 13:55:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:20:26 UTC