W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > May 2007

Re: SfN meeting submission

From: <jbarkley@nist.gov>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 08:29:42 -0400
Message-ID: <1178368182.463c78b611c04@webmail.nist.gov>
To: William Bug <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, jbarkley@nist.gov


I agree as well.

jb


Date:  Sat, 5 May 2007 05:35:20 -0400 
From:  William Bug <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu> 
To:  public-semweb-lifesci hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> 
Subject:  Re: SfN meeting submission 
Quoting William Bug <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>:

> I agree completely, Kei.
> 
> Don - do you want me to set up a Google Doc for this?  If you've  
> already got a Word version, this can be directly imported.  Google  
> Doc can import the following word proc. docs:
> 	Microsoft Word (.doc), Rich Text (.rtf), OpenDocument Text (.odt)  
> and StarOffice (.sxw).
> 
> If you have a Google Doc account, you can also send the doc to Google  
> Docs as an email attachment (they give you a specific email to send  
> it to), and Google Doc will set up the document.
> 
> Cheers,
> Bill
> 
> On May 4, 2007, at 12:14 PM, Kei Cheung wrote:
> 
> > Hi Bill et al,
> >
> > Google doc would also be fine if people agree. Thanks for taking  
> > the initiative to set it up. In my opinion, it would be important  
> > to continue working with the current group of people (e.g., Alan,  
> > June, Gwen, Huajun, ... if they are willing to continue to involve)  
> > who've been working on the current use case/demo to help extend  
> > future work, while new people can be recruited if there is a fit.  
> > Just my two-cent thought. I have to go, as I need to prepare for my  
> > WWW2007 workshop ...
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > -Kei
> >
> > William Bug wrote:
> >> Hi Don, Kei, John, Matthias, et al.,
> >>
> >> Kudos to us all.  I realize what a crunch folks preparing for next  
> >> week's demo are under, but this is an important aspect of  
> >> amortizing the FANTASTIC EFFORT so many have invested in this.
> >>
> >> I'd suggest a Google Doc, Don.  It's really the easiest way to go  
> >> by far.  Anything else - passing around a Word file or culling/ 
> >> integrating copy from a Wiki are much more labor intensive.  I've  
> >> been using Google Docs more and more since we did the work last  
> >> Nov/Dec. on the earlier HCLS manuscript, and it's definitely been  
> >> greasing the wheels on these sorts of far reaching, collaborative  
> >> manuscripts.  I'd be glad to set it up - or help you set it up -  
> >> if you like.  I've done this for several recent manuscripts, so  
> >> I've got the "gotchas" pretty well worked out.
> >>
> >> Re: the content - remember - for the abstract - it's just text and  
> >> very little of that.  I'd recommend the goal should be to take  
> >> whatever we already have describing the demo and re-tool that for  
> >> a neuroscientist/neuroinformaticist audience.
> >>
> >> Matthias had an excellent suggestion for a figure - which will be  
> >> just what we want for the result poster, but that won't be needed  
> >> until late October.  By then, if there's sufficient data, we'll be  
> >> able to use the FANTASTIC tool Alan R. had recommended - Vizster  
> >> (http://jheer.org/vizster/) - to create a very impressive  
> >> visualization for the poster!
> >> Just my unsolicited $0.02 - as always.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Bill
> >>
> >> On May 4, 2007, at 10:23 AM, Kei Cheung wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi John, Don, Matthias, Bill, Mark , et al.,
> >>>
> >>> It sounds like the group has an increasing interest, enthusiasm,  
> >>> commitment, and support to submit an abstract to SfN. If there is  
> >>> no objection, let's go for it.
> >>>
> >>> Don, thanks for taking the lead on this. Is the deadline May 15?  
> >>> Some people will be away next week for WWW2007. You might want to  
> >>> consider creating a wiki page so that people who have been  
> >>> involved in the demo (use case, data conversion,  
> >>> coordination ...) can participate (just my personal suggestion).  
> >>> Please let me know what I can do to help. I'll try to see if I  
> >>> can go to SfN this year as the SenseLab group was invited to give  
> >>> a demo at the INCF booth (International Neuroinformatics  
> >>> Coordinating Facility). I'll try to talk to Gordon to see if we  
> >>> can include a semantic web related demo there ...
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>>
> >>> -Kei
> >>>
> >>> jbarkley@nist.gov <mailto:jbarkley@nist.gov> wrote:
> >>>> hi don,
> >>>>
> >>>> Works for me as well, and I'll be glad to help anyway I can.
> >>>>
> >>>> thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> jb
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Date:  Thu, 3 May 2007 17:00:09 -0400 From:  William Bug  
> >>>> <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>>  
> >>>> To:  public-semweb-lifesci hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org  
> >>>> <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>> Subject:  Re: SfN meeting  
> >>>> submission Quoting William Bug <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu  
> >>>> <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>>:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi Don,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This works for me.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In regards to the suggestion Mark made, I think some of his   
> >>>>> suggestions sound very practical.  I'd be glad to participate -  
> >>>>> or  not - depending on the need and intended outcome.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> With this in mind, if you'd like someone to vet what you work  
> >>>>> up - or  work with you on it, Don - I'd be glad to do that.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>> Bill
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On May 3, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Donald Doherty wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Here's my proposal:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I write a quick rough draft and send a copy to all interested  
> >>>>>> parties.
> >>>>>> People actually contributing to the writing should mostly be   
> >>>>>> neuroscientists
> >>>>>> but of course include input from the rest.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Then I'll take all of the input and work up a revised abstract  
> >>>>>> and  send it
> >>>>>> back out to all interested parties for further feedback.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Repeat until everyone is happy and/or we run out of time. Then  
> >>>>>> we  decide to
> >>>>>> submit or not.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> About authors, here is the Neuroscience community standard.  
> >>>>>> First  author is
> >>>>>> usually the graduate student and last author is usually the  
> >>>>>> principal
> >>>>>> investigator.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Submitter must be first author...so if I take this on everyone  
> >>>>>> must be
> >>>>>> comfortable with me being the grad student :^). We should  
> >>>>>> probably  put the
> >>>>>> person who put the most sweat into the demo as last author.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hopefully the author issue won't be too divisive since this  
> >>>>>> is  simply an
> >>>>>> abstract. The important thing is that everyone is acknowledged.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Of highest importance is that the demo gets in front of the   
> >>>>>> neuroscience
> >>>>>> community at their biggest meeting.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What do you think?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Don
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>> From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org <mailto:public- 
> >>>>>> semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org>
> >>>>>> [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Kei  
> >>>>>> Cheung
> >>>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 12:19 PM
> >>>>>> To: William Bug
> >>>>>> Cc: public-semweb-lifesci hcls
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: SfN meeting submission
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Bill et al.,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I agree that it's important to make our SW/Neuro demo visible  
> >>>>>> to the
> >>>>>> neuroscience community. For example, I have asked Gordon  
> >>>>>> Shepherd  (PI of
> >>>>>> SenseLab) to look at the AD use case written by June, Gwen, et  
> >>>>>> al  to see
> >>>>>> if any comments/suggestions can be made. It would be great if  
> >>>>>> we  can get
> >>>>>> more neuroscientists involved to help make our work more   
> >>>>>> scientifically
> >>>>>> relevant. I believe this would also help make SW  
> >>>>>> technologically  credible.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regarding the SfN abstract, my concern is that we might not be  
> >>>>>> able to
> >>>>>> meet the deadline given that people are currently busy  
> >>>>>> preparing  for the
> >>>>>> upcoming demo at WWW2007 next week. In addition to what to  
> >>>>>> write  and how
> >>>>>> to write it (it probably won't take long for an abstract),  we  
> >>>>>> need to
> >>>>>> discuss how the author list should appear. All these may take  
> >>>>>> some  time
> >>>>>> to resolve as part of the community process, but we'd better  
> >>>>>> start
> >>>>>> thinking/discussing about it soon ...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -Kei
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> William Bug wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Don, Matthias, John, Kei, et al.,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I too would like to contribute to an SfN abstract in this  
> >>>>>>> context.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I believe given the domain HCLS IG is covering -  
> >>>>>>> neurodegenerative
> >>>>>>> disease - despite the lack of a full, refereed article, this  
> >>>>>>> is a  very
> >>>>>>> important venue in which to present, in order to help bolster  
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>> relevance and credibility of this effort to the general  
> >>>>>>> neuroscience
> >>>>>>> community.  With a working demo, it would be a shame NOT to  
> >>>>>>> have it
> >>>>>>> represented at the SfN meeting.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> We could also look to use such an abstract as starting  
> >>>>>>> material for a
> >>>>>>> full submission to journals that cover neuroinformatics such as
> >>>>>>> Neuroinformatics, PLoS Computational Biology, or Journal of
> >>>>>>> Computational Neuroscience.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In regards to relevant neuroscience meetings, there are also the
> >>>>>>> meetings hosted by:
> >>>>>>> Federation of European Neuroscience Societies (FENS):
> >>>>>>> http://fens.mdc-berlin.de/calendar/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> International Brain Research Organization (IBRO):
> >>>>>>> http://www.ibro.org/Pub_Events_Search.asp?Search=.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The Japan Neuroscience Society
> >>>>>>> http://www.jnss.org/english/index_e.html
> >>>>>>> http://www2.convention.jp/neuro2007/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Federation of Asian and Oceanian Neuroscience Societies (FAONS)
> >>>>>>> http://www.faons.org/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm not certain what the deadlines are for the associated  
> >>>>>>> meetings.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>> Bill
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On May 2, 2007, at 11:51 AM, Donald Doherty wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi Matthias,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> That'd be great! SfN abstracts are brief (max. 2300  
> >>>>>>>> characters  including
> >>>>>>>> punctuation!) so focusing on the value to neuroscientists  
> >>>>>>>> sounds  like the
> >>>>>>>> right course.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Abstract may be presented or posters. Slide presentations  
> >>>>>>>> are  kept very
> >>>>>>>> brief and there is so much going on most people won't see a
> >>>>>>>> particular slide
> >>>>>>>> presentation. Even if we indicate our preference for a  
> >>>>>>>> slide  presentation
> >>>>>>>> it's likely we wouldn't get it.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If we do a poster it will be up half a day. We can bring our  
> >>>>>>>> demo  machine
> >>>>>>>> and set it up next to the poster. (I've seen BIRN and others  
> >>>>>>>> do  this.
> >>>>>>>> Wireless is generally available.) I think this is the  
> >>>>>>>> preferred mode
> >>>>>>>> for us.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> There is also a $75 submission fee.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I'm willing to take responsibility for paying the submission  
> >>>>>>>> fee,  getting
> >>>>>>>> the poster up, staying there while it's up, and working the  
> >>>>>>>> demo as
> >>>>>>>> long as
> >>>>>>>> everyone is interested in doing this and a demo machine will be
> >>>>>>>> available.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> We won't get a paper out of it but I think it's worthwhile  
> >>>>>>>> to  expose the
> >>>>>>>> end-user community (neuroscientists) to the value the  
> >>>>>>>> Semantic Web
> >>>>>>>> technologies may provide to them.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Best wishes,
> >>>>>>>> Don
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>>> From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org <mailto:public- 
> >>>>>>>> semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org>
> >>>>>>>> <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org>
> >>>>>>>> [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of
> >>>>>>>> samwald@gmx.at <mailto:samwald@gmx.at>
> >>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 9:37 AM
> >>>>>>>> To: donald.doherty@brainstage.com  
> >>>>>>>> <mailto:donald.doherty@brainstage.com>
> >>>>>>>> <mailto:donald.doherty@brainstage.com>; public-semweb- 
> >>>>>>>> lifesci@w3.org <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
> >>>>>>>> <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
> >>>>>>>> Subject: SfN meeting submission
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi Don,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I would help with the abstract for SfN where I can, of  
> >>>>>>>> course. I  guess it
> >>>>>>>> should be even more focussed on the requirements and use  
> >>>>>>>> cases in
> >>>>>>>> Neuroscience than the BMC Bioinformatics paper. Mainly a  
> >>>>>>>> description
> >>>>>>>> of the
> >>>>>>>> collaborating neuroscience groups, their motivation and the  
> >>>>>>>> types of
> >>>>>>>> information that we are integrating, and less about the  
> >>>>>>>> technical
> >>>>>>>> details.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I guess it is much too late to start writing a group paper  
> >>>>>>>> for  the ISMB
> >>>>>>>> workshop now. A poster abstract would be possible, but I  
> >>>>>>>> think we
> >>>>>>>> don't want
> >>>>>>>> to present a poster.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> cheers,
> >>>>>>>> Matthias
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> This year's Society for Neuroscience meeting abstracts are  
> >>>>>>>>> due  May 15th.
> >>>>>>>>> I'd
> >>>>>>>>> like to take the lead on submitting an abstract if the team is
> >>>>>>>>> interested.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Don
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> P.S. This year's meeting is November 3-7 in San Diego,  
> >>>>>>>>> California.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>>>> From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org <mailto:public- 
> >>>>>>>>> semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org>
> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org>
> >>>>>>>>> [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of  
> >>>>>>>>> Alan
> >>>>>>>>> Ruttenberg
> >>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 12:57 AM
> >>>>>>>>> To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org <mailto:public-semweb-  
> >>>>>>>>> lifesci@w3.org <mailto:lifesci@w3.org>>
> >>>>>>>>> Subject: ISMB Bio-Ontologies Meeting
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I forget, was someone submitting an abstract about our work  
> >>>>>>>>> to this
> >>>>>>>>> workshop?
> >>>>>>>>> -Alan
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 26, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Susanna wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> ** Apologies for cross posting **CALL FOR PAPERS and POSTER
> >>>>>>>>>> ABSTRACTS (Deadline May 1st)
> >>>>>>>>>> Proceedings in BMC Bioinformatics
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> *^**^***^****^****^****^****^****^****^****^****^****^*****^* 
> >>>>>>>>>> *^*** ^**
> >>>>>>>>>> Bio-Ontologies SIG Workshop
> >>>>>>>>>> Vienna, Austria: July 20 2007
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> "Bio-Ontologies: ten years past and looking to the future"
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> *^**^***^****^****^****^****^****^****^****^****^****^*****^* 
> >>>>>>>>>> *^*** ^**
> >>>>>>>>>> 15th ISMB & 6th ECCB Vienna, Austria: July 18-25, 2007
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> CALL FOR PAPERS and POSTER ABSTRACTS (Deadline May 1st)
> >>>>>>>>>> Proceedings in BMC Bioinformatics
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The long-standing ISMB Bio-Ontologies SIG is in its tenth
> >>>>>>>>>> consecutive year. This year the workshop will have a  
> >>>>>>>>>> celebratory
> >>>>>>>>>> and reflective discussion on "Bio-Ontologies: ten years  
> >>>>>>>>>> past and
> >>>>>>>>>> looking to the future".
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> PROGRAM CHAIRS:
> >>>>>>>>>> Robert Stevens (1), Phillip Lord (2), Robin McEntire (3),  
> >>>>>>>>>> Susanna-
> >>>>>>>>>> A. Sansone (4)
> >>>>>>>>>> 1.    School of Computer Science, University of  
> >>>>>>>>>> Manchester, UK
> >>>>>>>>>> 2.    School of Computing Science, University of  
> >>>>>>>>>> Newcastle, UK
> >>>>>>>>>> 3.    GlaxoSmithKline, USA
> >>>>>>>>>> 4.    EMBL-EBI The European Bioinformatics Institute,   
> >>>>>>>>>> Cambridge, UK
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> WEBSITES:
> >>>>>>>>>> Bio-Ontologies SIG workshop: http://bio-ontologies.org.uk
> >>>>>>>>>> ISMB & ECCB main conference website http://www.iscb.org/  
> >>>>>>>>>> ismbeccb2007
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> ABOUT THE BIO-ONTOLOGIES SIG WORKSHOP
> >>>>>>>>>> The workshop will continue offer an informal environment for
> >>>>>>>>>> presentation and discussion of ontologies and their role in
> >>>>>>>>>> providing a mechanism for organising, sharing and  
> >>>>>>>>>> reconciling  data.
> >>>>>>>>>> This year, to celebrate its tenth anniversary, we have  
> >>>>>>>>>> invited  four
> >>>>>>>>>> presenters from the first bio-ontologies tutorial and meeting
> >>>>>>>>>> organisers to sit on a panel, namely: Mark Musen, Peter  
> >>>>>>>>>> Karp, Russ
> >>>>>>>>>> Altman and Steffen Schulze-Kremer
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> They will be asked to present positions on the following   
> >>>>>>>>>> questions:
> >>>>>>>>>> 1. What has been the best thing to have happened in bio- 
> >>>>>>>>>> ontologies
> >>>>>>>>>> in the past ten years?
> >>>>>>>>>> 2. What has been the worst thing to have happened in bio-  
> >>>>>>>>>> ontologies
> >>>>>>>>>> in the past ten years?
> >>>>>>>>>> 3. How must bio-ontologies progress in the next ten years?
> >>>>>>>>>> 4. How must bio-ontologies not progress in the next ten years
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> CALL FOR PAPERS AND POSTER ABSTRACT:
> >>>>>>>>>> We are inviting two types of submissions SHORT PAPER  
> >>>>>>>>>> papers (up to
> >>>>>>>>>> 4 pages) and POSTER ABSTRACT (up to 1/2 page) from any  
> >>>>>>>>>> aspect  doing
> >>>>>>>>>> bio-ontology research or using bio-ontologies to do  
> >>>>>>>>>> bioinformatics
> >>>>>>>>>> research. Topics include, but are not restricted to:
> >>>>>>>>>> - Biological Applications of Ontologies
> >>>>>>>>>> - Reports on Newly Developed or Existing Bio-Ontologies
> >>>>>>>>>> - Tools for Developing Ontologies
> >>>>>>>>>> - Use of Ontologies in Data Communication Standards
> >>>>>>>>>> - Use of Semantic Web technologies in Bioinformatics
> >>>>>>>>>> - The implications of Bio-Ontologies or the Semantic Web  
> >>>>>>>>>> for the
> >>>>>>>>>> drug discovery process
> >>>>>>>>>> - Current Research In Ontology Languages and its  
> >>>>>>>>>> implication for
> >>>>>>>>>> Bio-Ontologies
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> PROGRAM COMMITTEE
> >>>>>>>>>> Abstracts will be reviewed by the Program Committee,  
> >>>>>>>>>> including the
> >>>>>>>>>> Program Chairs and additionally: David Benton, Suzanna  
> >>>>>>>>>> Lewis,  Chris
> >>>>>>>>>> Mungall and Alan Ruttenberg.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> PUBLICATION OF THE PROCEEDINGS
> >>>>>>>>>> The Programme Committee will also select those papers,  
> >>>>>>>>>> which are
> >>>>>>>>>> suitable for further publication in a BMC Bioinformatics
> >>>>>>>>>> Supplement. Authors will be invited to resubmit full papers.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> DEADLINES
> >>>>>>>>>> Submissions due: May 1st 2007
> >>>>>>>>>> Notification of acceptance: May 21st 2007
> >>>>>>>>>> Final versions due: May 31st 2007
> >>>>>>>>>> Workshop: July 20th 2007
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> -- Susanna-Assunta Sansone, PhD NET Project - Coordinator  
> >>>>>>>>>> www.ebi.ac.uk/net-project <http://www.ebi.ac.uk/net- 
> >>>>>>>>>> project> The
> >>>>>>>>>> European Bioinformatics Institute
> >>>>>>>>>> email: sansone@ebi.ac.uk <mailto:sansone@ebi.ac.uk> EMBL   
> >>>>>>>>>> Outstation
> >>>>>>>>>> - Hinxton direct: +44 (0)
> >>>>>>>>>> 1223 494 691 Wellcome Trust Genome Campus fax: +44 (0)1223  
> >>>>>>>>>> 494 468
> >>>>>>>>>> Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK room: A229
> >>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------- 
> >>>>>>>>>> ----- ----
> >>>>>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> >>>>>>>>>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express  
> >>>>>>>>>> and take
> >>>>>>>>>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it  
> >>>>>>>>>> now.
> >>>>>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>> Obo-discuss mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>> Obo-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Obo- 
> >>>>>>>>>> discuss@lists.sourceforge.net>
> >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Obo-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net>
> >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obo-discuss
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -- 
> >>>>>>>> "Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ...
> >>>>>>>> Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Bill Bug
> >>>>>>> Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Laboratory for Bioimaging  & Anatomical Informatics
> >>>>>>> www.neuroterrain.org
> >>>>>>> Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy
> >>>>>>> Drexel University College of Medicine
> >>>>>>> 2900 Queen Lane
> >>>>>>> Philadelphia, PA    19129
> >>>>>>> 215 991 8430 (ph)
> >>>>>>> 610 457 0443 (mobile)
> >>>>>>> 215 843 9367 (fax)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Please Note: I now have a new email -  
> >>>>>>> William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>
> >>>>>>> <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> Bill Bug
> >>>>> Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Laboratory for Bioimaging  & Anatomical Informatics
> >>>>> www.neuroterrain.org
> >>>>> Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy
> >>>>> Drexel University College of Medicine
> >>>>> 2900 Queen Lane
> >>>>> Philadelphia, PA    19129
> >>>>> 215 991 8430 (ph)
> >>>>> 610 457 0443 (mobile)
> >>>>> 215 843 9367 (fax)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please Note: I now have a new email - William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu  
> >>>>> <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Bill Bug
> >> Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer
> >>
> >> Laboratory for Bioimaging  & Anatomical Informatics
> >> www.neuroterrain.org
> >> Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy
> >> Drexel University College of Medicine
> >> 2900 Queen Lane
> >> Philadelphia, PA    19129
> >> 215 991 8430 (ph)
> >> 610 457 0443 (mobile)
> >> 215 843 9367 (fax)
> >>
> >>
> >> Please Note: I now have a new email - William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu  
> >> <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> Bill Bug
> Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer
> 
> Laboratory for Bioimaging  & Anatomical Informatics
> www.neuroterrain.org
> Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy
> Drexel University College of Medicine
> 2900 Queen Lane
> Philadelphia, PA    19129
> 215 991 8430 (ph)
> 610 457 0443 (mobile)
> 215 843 9367 (fax)
> 
> 
> Please Note: I now have a new email - William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Saturday, 5 May 2007 12:32:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:20:26 UTC