- From: <jbarkley@nist.gov>
- Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 08:29:42 -0400
- To: William Bug <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>
- Cc: public-semweb-lifesci hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, jbarkley@nist.gov
I agree as well. jb Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 05:35:20 -0400 From: William Bug <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu> To: public-semweb-lifesci hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> Subject: Re: SfN meeting submission Quoting William Bug <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>: > I agree completely, Kei. > > Don - do you want me to set up a Google Doc for this? If you've > already got a Word version, this can be directly imported. Google > Doc can import the following word proc. docs: > Microsoft Word (.doc), Rich Text (.rtf), OpenDocument Text (.odt) > and StarOffice (.sxw). > > If you have a Google Doc account, you can also send the doc to Google > Docs as an email attachment (they give you a specific email to send > it to), and Google Doc will set up the document. > > Cheers, > Bill > > On May 4, 2007, at 12:14 PM, Kei Cheung wrote: > > > Hi Bill et al, > > > > Google doc would also be fine if people agree. Thanks for taking > > the initiative to set it up. In my opinion, it would be important > > to continue working with the current group of people (e.g., Alan, > > June, Gwen, Huajun, ... if they are willing to continue to involve) > > who've been working on the current use case/demo to help extend > > future work, while new people can be recruited if there is a fit. > > Just my two-cent thought. I have to go, as I need to prepare for my > > WWW2007 workshop ... > > > > Best, > > > > -Kei > > > > William Bug wrote: > >> Hi Don, Kei, John, Matthias, et al., > >> > >> Kudos to us all. I realize what a crunch folks preparing for next > >> week's demo are under, but this is an important aspect of > >> amortizing the FANTASTIC EFFORT so many have invested in this. > >> > >> I'd suggest a Google Doc, Don. It's really the easiest way to go > >> by far. Anything else - passing around a Word file or culling/ > >> integrating copy from a Wiki are much more labor intensive. I've > >> been using Google Docs more and more since we did the work last > >> Nov/Dec. on the earlier HCLS manuscript, and it's definitely been > >> greasing the wheels on these sorts of far reaching, collaborative > >> manuscripts. I'd be glad to set it up - or help you set it up - > >> if you like. I've done this for several recent manuscripts, so > >> I've got the "gotchas" pretty well worked out. > >> > >> Re: the content - remember - for the abstract - it's just text and > >> very little of that. I'd recommend the goal should be to take > >> whatever we already have describing the demo and re-tool that for > >> a neuroscientist/neuroinformaticist audience. > >> > >> Matthias had an excellent suggestion for a figure - which will be > >> just what we want for the result poster, but that won't be needed > >> until late October. By then, if there's sufficient data, we'll be > >> able to use the FANTASTIC tool Alan R. had recommended - Vizster > >> (http://jheer.org/vizster/) - to create a very impressive > >> visualization for the poster! > >> Just my unsolicited $0.02 - as always. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Bill > >> > >> On May 4, 2007, at 10:23 AM, Kei Cheung wrote: > >> > >>> Hi John, Don, Matthias, Bill, Mark , et al., > >>> > >>> It sounds like the group has an increasing interest, enthusiasm, > >>> commitment, and support to submit an abstract to SfN. If there is > >>> no objection, let's go for it. > >>> > >>> Don, thanks for taking the lead on this. Is the deadline May 15? > >>> Some people will be away next week for WWW2007. You might want to > >>> consider creating a wiki page so that people who have been > >>> involved in the demo (use case, data conversion, > >>> coordination ...) can participate (just my personal suggestion). > >>> Please let me know what I can do to help. I'll try to see if I > >>> can go to SfN this year as the SenseLab group was invited to give > >>> a demo at the INCF booth (International Neuroinformatics > >>> Coordinating Facility). I'll try to talk to Gordon to see if we > >>> can include a semantic web related demo there ... > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> > >>> -Kei > >>> > >>> jbarkley@nist.gov <mailto:jbarkley@nist.gov> wrote: > >>>> hi don, > >>>> > >>>> Works for me as well, and I'll be glad to help anyway I can. > >>>> > >>>> thanks, > >>>> > >>>> jb > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 17:00:09 -0400 From: William Bug > >>>> <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>> > >>>> To: public-semweb-lifesci hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > >>>> <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>> Subject: Re: SfN meeting > >>>> submission Quoting William Bug <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu > >>>> <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>>: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Hi Don, > >>>>> > >>>>> This works for me. > >>>>> > >>>>> In regards to the suggestion Mark made, I think some of his > >>>>> suggestions sound very practical. I'd be glad to participate - > >>>>> or not - depending on the need and intended outcome. > >>>>> > >>>>> With this in mind, if you'd like someone to vet what you work > >>>>> up - or work with you on it, Don - I'd be glad to do that. > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers, > >>>>> Bill > >>>>> > >>>>> On May 3, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Donald Doherty wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Here's my proposal: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I write a quick rough draft and send a copy to all interested > >>>>>> parties. > >>>>>> People actually contributing to the writing should mostly be > >>>>>> neuroscientists > >>>>>> but of course include input from the rest. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Then I'll take all of the input and work up a revised abstract > >>>>>> and send it > >>>>>> back out to all interested parties for further feedback. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Repeat until everyone is happy and/or we run out of time. Then > >>>>>> we decide to > >>>>>> submit or not. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> About authors, here is the Neuroscience community standard. > >>>>>> First author is > >>>>>> usually the graduate student and last author is usually the > >>>>>> principal > >>>>>> investigator. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Submitter must be first author...so if I take this on everyone > >>>>>> must be > >>>>>> comfortable with me being the grad student :^). We should > >>>>>> probably put the > >>>>>> person who put the most sweat into the demo as last author. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hopefully the author issue won't be too divisive since this > >>>>>> is simply an > >>>>>> abstract. The important thing is that everyone is acknowledged. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Of highest importance is that the demo gets in front of the > >>>>>> neuroscience > >>>>>> community at their biggest meeting. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What do you think? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Don > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>> From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org <mailto:public- > >>>>>> semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org> > >>>>>> [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Kei > >>>>>> Cheung > >>>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 12:19 PM > >>>>>> To: William Bug > >>>>>> Cc: public-semweb-lifesci hcls > >>>>>> Subject: Re: SfN meeting submission > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Bill et al., > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I agree that it's important to make our SW/Neuro demo visible > >>>>>> to the > >>>>>> neuroscience community. For example, I have asked Gordon > >>>>>> Shepherd (PI of > >>>>>> SenseLab) to look at the AD use case written by June, Gwen, et > >>>>>> al to see > >>>>>> if any comments/suggestions can be made. It would be great if > >>>>>> we can get > >>>>>> more neuroscientists involved to help make our work more > >>>>>> scientifically > >>>>>> relevant. I believe this would also help make SW > >>>>>> technologically credible. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Regarding the SfN abstract, my concern is that we might not be > >>>>>> able to > >>>>>> meet the deadline given that people are currently busy > >>>>>> preparing for the > >>>>>> upcoming demo at WWW2007 next week. In addition to what to > >>>>>> write and how > >>>>>> to write it (it probably won't take long for an abstract), we > >>>>>> need to > >>>>>> discuss how the author list should appear. All these may take > >>>>>> some time > >>>>>> to resolve as part of the community process, but we'd better > >>>>>> start > >>>>>> thinking/discussing about it soon ... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -Kei > >>>>>> > >>>>>> William Bug wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi Don, Matthias, John, Kei, et al., > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I too would like to contribute to an SfN abstract in this > >>>>>>> context. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I believe given the domain HCLS IG is covering - > >>>>>>> neurodegenerative > >>>>>>> disease - despite the lack of a full, refereed article, this > >>>>>>> is a very > >>>>>>> important venue in which to present, in order to help bolster > >>>>>>> the > >>>>>>> relevance and credibility of this effort to the general > >>>>>>> neuroscience > >>>>>>> community. With a working demo, it would be a shame NOT to > >>>>>>> have it > >>>>>>> represented at the SfN meeting. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> We could also look to use such an abstract as starting > >>>>>>> material for a > >>>>>>> full submission to journals that cover neuroinformatics such as > >>>>>>> Neuroinformatics, PLoS Computational Biology, or Journal of > >>>>>>> Computational Neuroscience. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> In regards to relevant neuroscience meetings, there are also the > >>>>>>> meetings hosted by: > >>>>>>> Federation of European Neuroscience Societies (FENS): > >>>>>>> http://fens.mdc-berlin.de/calendar/ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> International Brain Research Organization (IBRO): > >>>>>>> http://www.ibro.org/Pub_Events_Search.asp?Search=. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The Japan Neuroscience Society > >>>>>>> http://www.jnss.org/english/index_e.html > >>>>>>> http://www2.convention.jp/neuro2007/ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Federation of Asian and Oceanian Neuroscience Societies (FAONS) > >>>>>>> http://www.faons.org/ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'm not certain what the deadlines are for the associated > >>>>>>> meetings. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>> Bill > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On May 2, 2007, at 11:51 AM, Donald Doherty wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi Matthias, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> That'd be great! SfN abstracts are brief (max. 2300 > >>>>>>>> characters including > >>>>>>>> punctuation!) so focusing on the value to neuroscientists > >>>>>>>> sounds like the > >>>>>>>> right course. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Abstract may be presented or posters. Slide presentations > >>>>>>>> are kept very > >>>>>>>> brief and there is so much going on most people won't see a > >>>>>>>> particular slide > >>>>>>>> presentation. Even if we indicate our preference for a > >>>>>>>> slide presentation > >>>>>>>> it's likely we wouldn't get it. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> If we do a poster it will be up half a day. We can bring our > >>>>>>>> demo machine > >>>>>>>> and set it up next to the poster. (I've seen BIRN and others > >>>>>>>> do this. > >>>>>>>> Wireless is generally available.) I think this is the > >>>>>>>> preferred mode > >>>>>>>> for us. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> There is also a $75 submission fee. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I'm willing to take responsibility for paying the submission > >>>>>>>> fee, getting > >>>>>>>> the poster up, staying there while it's up, and working the > >>>>>>>> demo as > >>>>>>>> long as > >>>>>>>> everyone is interested in doing this and a demo machine will be > >>>>>>>> available. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> We won't get a paper out of it but I think it's worthwhile > >>>>>>>> to expose the > >>>>>>>> end-user community (neuroscientists) to the value the > >>>>>>>> Semantic Web > >>>>>>>> technologies may provide to them. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Best wishes, > >>>>>>>> Don > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>>>> From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org <mailto:public- > >>>>>>>> semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org> > >>>>>>>> <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org> > >>>>>>>> [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of > >>>>>>>> samwald@gmx.at <mailto:samwald@gmx.at> > >>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 9:37 AM > >>>>>>>> To: donald.doherty@brainstage.com > >>>>>>>> <mailto:donald.doherty@brainstage.com> > >>>>>>>> <mailto:donald.doherty@brainstage.com>; public-semweb- > >>>>>>>> lifesci@w3.org <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> > >>>>>>>> <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> > >>>>>>>> Subject: SfN meeting submission > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi Don, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I would help with the abstract for SfN where I can, of > >>>>>>>> course. I guess it > >>>>>>>> should be even more focussed on the requirements and use > >>>>>>>> cases in > >>>>>>>> Neuroscience than the BMC Bioinformatics paper. Mainly a > >>>>>>>> description > >>>>>>>> of the > >>>>>>>> collaborating neuroscience groups, their motivation and the > >>>>>>>> types of > >>>>>>>> information that we are integrating, and less about the > >>>>>>>> technical > >>>>>>>> details. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I guess it is much too late to start writing a group paper > >>>>>>>> for the ISMB > >>>>>>>> workshop now. A poster abstract would be possible, but I > >>>>>>>> think we > >>>>>>>> don't want > >>>>>>>> to present a poster. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> cheers, > >>>>>>>> Matthias > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> This year's Society for Neuroscience meeting abstracts are > >>>>>>>>> due May 15th. > >>>>>>>>> I'd > >>>>>>>>> like to take the lead on submitting an abstract if the team is > >>>>>>>>> interested. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Don > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> P.S. This year's meeting is November 3-7 in San Diego, > >>>>>>>>> California. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>>>>> From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org <mailto:public- > >>>>>>>>> semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org> > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org> > >>>>>>>>> [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of > >>>>>>>>> Alan > >>>>>>>>> Ruttenberg > >>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 12:57 AM > >>>>>>>>> To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org <mailto:public-semweb- > >>>>>>>>> lifesci@w3.org <mailto:lifesci@w3.org>> > >>>>>>>>> Subject: ISMB Bio-Ontologies Meeting > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I forget, was someone submitting an abstract about our work > >>>>>>>>> to this > >>>>>>>>> workshop? > >>>>>>>>> -Alan > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Apr 26, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Susanna wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> ** Apologies for cross posting **CALL FOR PAPERS and POSTER > >>>>>>>>>> ABSTRACTS (Deadline May 1st) > >>>>>>>>>> Proceedings in BMC Bioinformatics > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> *^**^***^****^****^****^****^****^****^****^****^****^*****^* > >>>>>>>>>> *^*** ^** > >>>>>>>>>> Bio-Ontologies SIG Workshop > >>>>>>>>>> Vienna, Austria: July 20 2007 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> "Bio-Ontologies: ten years past and looking to the future" > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> *^**^***^****^****^****^****^****^****^****^****^****^*****^* > >>>>>>>>>> *^*** ^** > >>>>>>>>>> 15th ISMB & 6th ECCB Vienna, Austria: July 18-25, 2007 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> CALL FOR PAPERS and POSTER ABSTRACTS (Deadline May 1st) > >>>>>>>>>> Proceedings in BMC Bioinformatics > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> The long-standing ISMB Bio-Ontologies SIG is in its tenth > >>>>>>>>>> consecutive year. This year the workshop will have a > >>>>>>>>>> celebratory > >>>>>>>>>> and reflective discussion on "Bio-Ontologies: ten years > >>>>>>>>>> past and > >>>>>>>>>> looking to the future". > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> PROGRAM CHAIRS: > >>>>>>>>>> Robert Stevens (1), Phillip Lord (2), Robin McEntire (3), > >>>>>>>>>> Susanna- > >>>>>>>>>> A. Sansone (4) > >>>>>>>>>> 1. School of Computer Science, University of > >>>>>>>>>> Manchester, UK > >>>>>>>>>> 2. School of Computing Science, University of > >>>>>>>>>> Newcastle, UK > >>>>>>>>>> 3. GlaxoSmithKline, USA > >>>>>>>>>> 4. EMBL-EBI The European Bioinformatics Institute, > >>>>>>>>>> Cambridge, UK > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> WEBSITES: > >>>>>>>>>> Bio-Ontologies SIG workshop: http://bio-ontologies.org.uk > >>>>>>>>>> ISMB & ECCB main conference website http://www.iscb.org/ > >>>>>>>>>> ismbeccb2007 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> ABOUT THE BIO-ONTOLOGIES SIG WORKSHOP > >>>>>>>>>> The workshop will continue offer an informal environment for > >>>>>>>>>> presentation and discussion of ontologies and their role in > >>>>>>>>>> providing a mechanism for organising, sharing and > >>>>>>>>>> reconciling data. > >>>>>>>>>> This year, to celebrate its tenth anniversary, we have > >>>>>>>>>> invited four > >>>>>>>>>> presenters from the first bio-ontologies tutorial and meeting > >>>>>>>>>> organisers to sit on a panel, namely: Mark Musen, Peter > >>>>>>>>>> Karp, Russ > >>>>>>>>>> Altman and Steffen Schulze-Kremer > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> They will be asked to present positions on the following > >>>>>>>>>> questions: > >>>>>>>>>> 1. What has been the best thing to have happened in bio- > >>>>>>>>>> ontologies > >>>>>>>>>> in the past ten years? > >>>>>>>>>> 2. What has been the worst thing to have happened in bio- > >>>>>>>>>> ontologies > >>>>>>>>>> in the past ten years? > >>>>>>>>>> 3. How must bio-ontologies progress in the next ten years? > >>>>>>>>>> 4. How must bio-ontologies not progress in the next ten years > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> CALL FOR PAPERS AND POSTER ABSTRACT: > >>>>>>>>>> We are inviting two types of submissions SHORT PAPER > >>>>>>>>>> papers (up to > >>>>>>>>>> 4 pages) and POSTER ABSTRACT (up to 1/2 page) from any > >>>>>>>>>> aspect doing > >>>>>>>>>> bio-ontology research or using bio-ontologies to do > >>>>>>>>>> bioinformatics > >>>>>>>>>> research. Topics include, but are not restricted to: > >>>>>>>>>> - Biological Applications of Ontologies > >>>>>>>>>> - Reports on Newly Developed or Existing Bio-Ontologies > >>>>>>>>>> - Tools for Developing Ontologies > >>>>>>>>>> - Use of Ontologies in Data Communication Standards > >>>>>>>>>> - Use of Semantic Web technologies in Bioinformatics > >>>>>>>>>> - The implications of Bio-Ontologies or the Semantic Web > >>>>>>>>>> for the > >>>>>>>>>> drug discovery process > >>>>>>>>>> - Current Research In Ontology Languages and its > >>>>>>>>>> implication for > >>>>>>>>>> Bio-Ontologies > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> PROGRAM COMMITTEE > >>>>>>>>>> Abstracts will be reviewed by the Program Committee, > >>>>>>>>>> including the > >>>>>>>>>> Program Chairs and additionally: David Benton, Suzanna > >>>>>>>>>> Lewis, Chris > >>>>>>>>>> Mungall and Alan Ruttenberg. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> PUBLICATION OF THE PROCEEDINGS > >>>>>>>>>> The Programme Committee will also select those papers, > >>>>>>>>>> which are > >>>>>>>>>> suitable for further publication in a BMC Bioinformatics > >>>>>>>>>> Supplement. Authors will be invited to resubmit full papers. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> DEADLINES > >>>>>>>>>> Submissions due: May 1st 2007 > >>>>>>>>>> Notification of acceptance: May 21st 2007 > >>>>>>>>>> Final versions due: May 31st 2007 > >>>>>>>>>> Workshop: July 20th 2007 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- Susanna-Assunta Sansone, PhD NET Project - Coordinator > >>>>>>>>>> www.ebi.ac.uk/net-project <http://www.ebi.ac.uk/net- > >>>>>>>>>> project> The > >>>>>>>>>> European Bioinformatics Institute > >>>>>>>>>> email: sansone@ebi.ac.uk <mailto:sansone@ebi.ac.uk> EMBL > >>>>>>>>>> Outstation > >>>>>>>>>> - Hinxton direct: +44 (0) > >>>>>>>>>> 1223 494 691 Wellcome Trust Genome Campus fax: +44 (0)1223 > >>>>>>>>>> 494 468 > >>>>>>>>>> Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK room: A229 > >>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>>> ----- ---- > >>>>>>>>>> --- > >>>>>>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > >>>>>>>>>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express > >>>>>>>>>> and take > >>>>>>>>>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it > >>>>>>>>>> now. > >>>>>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>>>> Obo-discuss mailing list > >>>>>>>>>> Obo-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Obo- > >>>>>>>>>> discuss@lists.sourceforge.net> > >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Obo-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net> > >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obo-discuss > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> "Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ... > >>>>>>>> Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Bill Bug > >>>>>>> Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Laboratory for Bioimaging & Anatomical Informatics > >>>>>>> www.neuroterrain.org > >>>>>>> Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy > >>>>>>> Drexel University College of Medicine > >>>>>>> 2900 Queen Lane > >>>>>>> Philadelphia, PA 19129 > >>>>>>> 215 991 8430 (ph) > >>>>>>> 610 457 0443 (mobile) > >>>>>>> 215 843 9367 (fax) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Please Note: I now have a new email - > >>>>>>> William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu> > >>>>>>> <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> Bill Bug > >>>>> Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer > >>>>> > >>>>> Laboratory for Bioimaging & Anatomical Informatics > >>>>> www.neuroterrain.org > >>>>> Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy > >>>>> Drexel University College of Medicine > >>>>> 2900 Queen Lane > >>>>> Philadelphia, PA 19129 > >>>>> 215 991 8430 (ph) > >>>>> 610 457 0443 (mobile) > >>>>> 215 843 9367 (fax) > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Please Note: I now have a new email - William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu > >>>>> <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> Bill Bug > >> Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer > >> > >> Laboratory for Bioimaging & Anatomical Informatics > >> www.neuroterrain.org > >> Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy > >> Drexel University College of Medicine > >> 2900 Queen Lane > >> Philadelphia, PA 19129 > >> 215 991 8430 (ph) > >> 610 457 0443 (mobile) > >> 215 843 9367 (fax) > >> > >> > >> Please Note: I now have a new email - William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu > >> <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > Bill Bug > Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer > > Laboratory for Bioimaging & Anatomical Informatics > www.neuroterrain.org > Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy > Drexel University College of Medicine > 2900 Queen Lane > Philadelphia, PA 19129 > 215 991 8430 (ph) > 610 457 0443 (mobile) > 215 843 9367 (fax) > > > Please Note: I now have a new email - William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 5 May 2007 12:32:39 UTC