- From: William Bug <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>
- Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 05:35:20 -0400
- To: public-semweb-lifesci hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <338EAFE5-BCB5-480E-9319-7B3C43AA5473@DrexelMed.edu>
I agree completely, Kei. Don - do you want me to set up a Google Doc for this? If you've already got a Word version, this can be directly imported. Google Doc can import the following word proc. docs: Microsoft Word (.doc), Rich Text (.rtf), OpenDocument Text (.odt) and StarOffice (.sxw). If you have a Google Doc account, you can also send the doc to Google Docs as an email attachment (they give you a specific email to send it to), and Google Doc will set up the document. Cheers, Bill On May 4, 2007, at 12:14 PM, Kei Cheung wrote: > Hi Bill et al, > > Google doc would also be fine if people agree. Thanks for taking > the initiative to set it up. In my opinion, it would be important > to continue working with the current group of people (e.g., Alan, > June, Gwen, Huajun, ... if they are willing to continue to involve) > who've been working on the current use case/demo to help extend > future work, while new people can be recruited if there is a fit. > Just my two-cent thought. I have to go, as I need to prepare for my > WWW2007 workshop ... > > Best, > > -Kei > > William Bug wrote: >> Hi Don, Kei, John, Matthias, et al., >> >> Kudos to us all. I realize what a crunch folks preparing for next >> week's demo are under, but this is an important aspect of >> amortizing the FANTASTIC EFFORT so many have invested in this. >> >> I'd suggest a Google Doc, Don. It's really the easiest way to go >> by far. Anything else - passing around a Word file or culling/ >> integrating copy from a Wiki are much more labor intensive. I've >> been using Google Docs more and more since we did the work last >> Nov/Dec. on the earlier HCLS manuscript, and it's definitely been >> greasing the wheels on these sorts of far reaching, collaborative >> manuscripts. I'd be glad to set it up - or help you set it up - >> if you like. I've done this for several recent manuscripts, so >> I've got the "gotchas" pretty well worked out. >> >> Re: the content - remember - for the abstract - it's just text and >> very little of that. I'd recommend the goal should be to take >> whatever we already have describing the demo and re-tool that for >> a neuroscientist/neuroinformaticist audience. >> >> Matthias had an excellent suggestion for a figure - which will be >> just what we want for the result poster, but that won't be needed >> until late October. By then, if there's sufficient data, we'll be >> able to use the FANTASTIC tool Alan R. had recommended - Vizster >> (http://jheer.org/vizster/) - to create a very impressive >> visualization for the poster! >> Just my unsolicited $0.02 - as always. >> >> Cheers, >> Bill >> >> On May 4, 2007, at 10:23 AM, Kei Cheung wrote: >> >>> Hi John, Don, Matthias, Bill, Mark , et al., >>> >>> It sounds like the group has an increasing interest, enthusiasm, >>> commitment, and support to submit an abstract to SfN. If there is >>> no objection, let's go for it. >>> >>> Don, thanks for taking the lead on this. Is the deadline May 15? >>> Some people will be away next week for WWW2007. You might want to >>> consider creating a wiki page so that people who have been >>> involved in the demo (use case, data conversion, >>> coordination ...) can participate (just my personal suggestion). >>> Please let me know what I can do to help. I'll try to see if I >>> can go to SfN this year as the SenseLab group was invited to give >>> a demo at the INCF booth (International Neuroinformatics >>> Coordinating Facility). I'll try to talk to Gordon to see if we >>> can include a semantic web related demo there ... >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> -Kei >>> >>> jbarkley@nist.gov <mailto:jbarkley@nist.gov> wrote: >>>> hi don, >>>> >>>> Works for me as well, and I'll be glad to help anyway I can. >>>> >>>> thanks, >>>> >>>> jb >>>> >>>> >>>> Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 17:00:09 -0400 From: William Bug >>>> <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>> >>>> To: public-semweb-lifesci hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org >>>> <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>> Subject: Re: SfN meeting >>>> submission Quoting William Bug <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu >>>> <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>>: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi Don, >>>>> >>>>> This works for me. >>>>> >>>>> In regards to the suggestion Mark made, I think some of his >>>>> suggestions sound very practical. I'd be glad to participate - >>>>> or not - depending on the need and intended outcome. >>>>> >>>>> With this in mind, if you'd like someone to vet what you work >>>>> up - or work with you on it, Don - I'd be glad to do that. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Bill >>>>> >>>>> On May 3, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Donald Doherty wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Here's my proposal: >>>>>> >>>>>> I write a quick rough draft and send a copy to all interested >>>>>> parties. >>>>>> People actually contributing to the writing should mostly be >>>>>> neuroscientists >>>>>> but of course include input from the rest. >>>>>> >>>>>> Then I'll take all of the input and work up a revised abstract >>>>>> and send it >>>>>> back out to all interested parties for further feedback. >>>>>> >>>>>> Repeat until everyone is happy and/or we run out of time. Then >>>>>> we decide to >>>>>> submit or not. >>>>>> >>>>>> About authors, here is the Neuroscience community standard. >>>>>> First author is >>>>>> usually the graduate student and last author is usually the >>>>>> principal >>>>>> investigator. >>>>>> >>>>>> Submitter must be first author...so if I take this on everyone >>>>>> must be >>>>>> comfortable with me being the grad student :^). We should >>>>>> probably put the >>>>>> person who put the most sweat into the demo as last author. >>>>>> >>>>>> Hopefully the author issue won't be too divisive since this >>>>>> is simply an >>>>>> abstract. The important thing is that everyone is acknowledged. >>>>>> >>>>>> Of highest importance is that the demo gets in front of the >>>>>> neuroscience >>>>>> community at their biggest meeting. >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>> >>>>>> Don >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org <mailto:public- >>>>>> semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org> >>>>>> [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Kei >>>>>> Cheung >>>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 12:19 PM >>>>>> To: William Bug >>>>>> Cc: public-semweb-lifesci hcls >>>>>> Subject: Re: SfN meeting submission >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Bill et al., >>>>>> >>>>>> I agree that it's important to make our SW/Neuro demo visible >>>>>> to the >>>>>> neuroscience community. For example, I have asked Gordon >>>>>> Shepherd (PI of >>>>>> SenseLab) to look at the AD use case written by June, Gwen, et >>>>>> al to see >>>>>> if any comments/suggestions can be made. It would be great if >>>>>> we can get >>>>>> more neuroscientists involved to help make our work more >>>>>> scientifically >>>>>> relevant. I believe this would also help make SW >>>>>> technologically credible. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regarding the SfN abstract, my concern is that we might not be >>>>>> able to >>>>>> meet the deadline given that people are currently busy >>>>>> preparing for the >>>>>> upcoming demo at WWW2007 next week. In addition to what to >>>>>> write and how >>>>>> to write it (it probably won't take long for an abstract), we >>>>>> need to >>>>>> discuss how the author list should appear. All these may take >>>>>> some time >>>>>> to resolve as part of the community process, but we'd better >>>>>> start >>>>>> thinking/discussing about it soon ... >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> >>>>>> -Kei >>>>>> >>>>>> William Bug wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Don, Matthias, John, Kei, et al., >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I too would like to contribute to an SfN abstract in this >>>>>>> context. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I believe given the domain HCLS IG is covering - >>>>>>> neurodegenerative >>>>>>> disease - despite the lack of a full, refereed article, this >>>>>>> is a very >>>>>>> important venue in which to present, in order to help bolster >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> relevance and credibility of this effort to the general >>>>>>> neuroscience >>>>>>> community. With a working demo, it would be a shame NOT to >>>>>>> have it >>>>>>> represented at the SfN meeting. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We could also look to use such an abstract as starting >>>>>>> material for a >>>>>>> full submission to journals that cover neuroinformatics such as >>>>>>> Neuroinformatics, PLoS Computational Biology, or Journal of >>>>>>> Computational Neuroscience. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In regards to relevant neuroscience meetings, there are also the >>>>>>> meetings hosted by: >>>>>>> Federation of European Neuroscience Societies (FENS): >>>>>>> http://fens.mdc-berlin.de/calendar/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> International Brain Research Organization (IBRO): >>>>>>> http://www.ibro.org/Pub_Events_Search.asp?Search=. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The Japan Neuroscience Society >>>>>>> http://www.jnss.org/english/index_e.html >>>>>>> http://www2.convention.jp/neuro2007/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Federation of Asian and Oceanian Neuroscience Societies (FAONS) >>>>>>> http://www.faons.org/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm not certain what the deadlines are for the associated >>>>>>> meetings. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Bill >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On May 2, 2007, at 11:51 AM, Donald Doherty wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Matthias, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That'd be great! SfN abstracts are brief (max. 2300 >>>>>>>> characters including >>>>>>>> punctuation!) so focusing on the value to neuroscientists >>>>>>>> sounds like the >>>>>>>> right course. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Abstract may be presented or posters. Slide presentations >>>>>>>> are kept very >>>>>>>> brief and there is so much going on most people won't see a >>>>>>>> particular slide >>>>>>>> presentation. Even if we indicate our preference for a >>>>>>>> slide presentation >>>>>>>> it's likely we wouldn't get it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If we do a poster it will be up half a day. We can bring our >>>>>>>> demo machine >>>>>>>> and set it up next to the poster. (I've seen BIRN and others >>>>>>>> do this. >>>>>>>> Wireless is generally available.) I think this is the >>>>>>>> preferred mode >>>>>>>> for us. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There is also a $75 submission fee. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm willing to take responsibility for paying the submission >>>>>>>> fee, getting >>>>>>>> the poster up, staying there while it's up, and working the >>>>>>>> demo as >>>>>>>> long as >>>>>>>> everyone is interested in doing this and a demo machine will be >>>>>>>> available. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We won't get a paper out of it but I think it's worthwhile >>>>>>>> to expose the >>>>>>>> end-user community (neuroscientists) to the value the >>>>>>>> Semantic Web >>>>>>>> technologies may provide to them. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best wishes, >>>>>>>> Don >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org <mailto:public- >>>>>>>> semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org> >>>>>>>> <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org> >>>>>>>> [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of >>>>>>>> samwald@gmx.at <mailto:samwald@gmx.at> >>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 9:37 AM >>>>>>>> To: donald.doherty@brainstage.com >>>>>>>> <mailto:donald.doherty@brainstage.com> >>>>>>>> <mailto:donald.doherty@brainstage.com>; public-semweb- >>>>>>>> lifesci@w3.org <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> >>>>>>>> <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> >>>>>>>> Subject: SfN meeting submission >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Don, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would help with the abstract for SfN where I can, of >>>>>>>> course. I guess it >>>>>>>> should be even more focussed on the requirements and use >>>>>>>> cases in >>>>>>>> Neuroscience than the BMC Bioinformatics paper. Mainly a >>>>>>>> description >>>>>>>> of the >>>>>>>> collaborating neuroscience groups, their motivation and the >>>>>>>> types of >>>>>>>> information that we are integrating, and less about the >>>>>>>> technical >>>>>>>> details. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I guess it is much too late to start writing a group paper >>>>>>>> for the ISMB >>>>>>>> workshop now. A poster abstract would be possible, but I >>>>>>>> think we >>>>>>>> don't want >>>>>>>> to present a poster. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>> Matthias >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This year's Society for Neuroscience meeting abstracts are >>>>>>>>> due May 15th. >>>>>>>>> I'd >>>>>>>>> like to take the lead on submitting an abstract if the team is >>>>>>>>> interested. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Don >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> P.S. This year's meeting is November 3-7 in San Diego, >>>>>>>>> California. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>> From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org <mailto:public- >>>>>>>>> semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org> >>>>>>>>> <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org> >>>>>>>>> [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of >>>>>>>>> Alan >>>>>>>>> Ruttenberg >>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 12:57 AM >>>>>>>>> To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org <mailto:public-semweb- >>>>>>>>> lifesci@w3.org <mailto:lifesci@w3.org>> >>>>>>>>> Subject: ISMB Bio-Ontologies Meeting >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I forget, was someone submitting an abstract about our work >>>>>>>>> to this >>>>>>>>> workshop? >>>>>>>>> -Alan >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 26, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Susanna wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ** Apologies for cross posting **CALL FOR PAPERS and POSTER >>>>>>>>>> ABSTRACTS (Deadline May 1st) >>>>>>>>>> Proceedings in BMC Bioinformatics >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *^**^***^****^****^****^****^****^****^****^****^****^*****^* >>>>>>>>>> *^*** ^** >>>>>>>>>> Bio-Ontologies SIG Workshop >>>>>>>>>> Vienna, Austria: July 20 2007 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Bio-Ontologies: ten years past and looking to the future" >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *^**^***^****^****^****^****^****^****^****^****^****^*****^* >>>>>>>>>> *^*** ^** >>>>>>>>>> 15th ISMB & 6th ECCB Vienna, Austria: July 18-25, 2007 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> CALL FOR PAPERS and POSTER ABSTRACTS (Deadline May 1st) >>>>>>>>>> Proceedings in BMC Bioinformatics >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The long-standing ISMB Bio-Ontologies SIG is in its tenth >>>>>>>>>> consecutive year. This year the workshop will have a >>>>>>>>>> celebratory >>>>>>>>>> and reflective discussion on "Bio-Ontologies: ten years >>>>>>>>>> past and >>>>>>>>>> looking to the future". >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> PROGRAM CHAIRS: >>>>>>>>>> Robert Stevens (1), Phillip Lord (2), Robin McEntire (3), >>>>>>>>>> Susanna- >>>>>>>>>> A. Sansone (4) >>>>>>>>>> 1. School of Computer Science, University of >>>>>>>>>> Manchester, UK >>>>>>>>>> 2. School of Computing Science, University of >>>>>>>>>> Newcastle, UK >>>>>>>>>> 3. GlaxoSmithKline, USA >>>>>>>>>> 4. EMBL-EBI The European Bioinformatics Institute, >>>>>>>>>> Cambridge, UK >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> WEBSITES: >>>>>>>>>> Bio-Ontologies SIG workshop: http://bio-ontologies.org.uk >>>>>>>>>> ISMB & ECCB main conference website http://www.iscb.org/ >>>>>>>>>> ismbeccb2007 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ABOUT THE BIO-ONTOLOGIES SIG WORKSHOP >>>>>>>>>> The workshop will continue offer an informal environment for >>>>>>>>>> presentation and discussion of ontologies and their role in >>>>>>>>>> providing a mechanism for organising, sharing and >>>>>>>>>> reconciling data. >>>>>>>>>> This year, to celebrate its tenth anniversary, we have >>>>>>>>>> invited four >>>>>>>>>> presenters from the first bio-ontologies tutorial and meeting >>>>>>>>>> organisers to sit on a panel, namely: Mark Musen, Peter >>>>>>>>>> Karp, Russ >>>>>>>>>> Altman and Steffen Schulze-Kremer >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> They will be asked to present positions on the following >>>>>>>>>> questions: >>>>>>>>>> 1. What has been the best thing to have happened in bio- >>>>>>>>>> ontologies >>>>>>>>>> in the past ten years? >>>>>>>>>> 2. What has been the worst thing to have happened in bio- >>>>>>>>>> ontologies >>>>>>>>>> in the past ten years? >>>>>>>>>> 3. How must bio-ontologies progress in the next ten years? >>>>>>>>>> 4. How must bio-ontologies not progress in the next ten years >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> CALL FOR PAPERS AND POSTER ABSTRACT: >>>>>>>>>> We are inviting two types of submissions SHORT PAPER >>>>>>>>>> papers (up to >>>>>>>>>> 4 pages) and POSTER ABSTRACT (up to 1/2 page) from any >>>>>>>>>> aspect doing >>>>>>>>>> bio-ontology research or using bio-ontologies to do >>>>>>>>>> bioinformatics >>>>>>>>>> research. Topics include, but are not restricted to: >>>>>>>>>> - Biological Applications of Ontologies >>>>>>>>>> - Reports on Newly Developed or Existing Bio-Ontologies >>>>>>>>>> - Tools for Developing Ontologies >>>>>>>>>> - Use of Ontologies in Data Communication Standards >>>>>>>>>> - Use of Semantic Web technologies in Bioinformatics >>>>>>>>>> - The implications of Bio-Ontologies or the Semantic Web >>>>>>>>>> for the >>>>>>>>>> drug discovery process >>>>>>>>>> - Current Research In Ontology Languages and its >>>>>>>>>> implication for >>>>>>>>>> Bio-Ontologies >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> PROGRAM COMMITTEE >>>>>>>>>> Abstracts will be reviewed by the Program Committee, >>>>>>>>>> including the >>>>>>>>>> Program Chairs and additionally: David Benton, Suzanna >>>>>>>>>> Lewis, Chris >>>>>>>>>> Mungall and Alan Ruttenberg. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> PUBLICATION OF THE PROCEEDINGS >>>>>>>>>> The Programme Committee will also select those papers, >>>>>>>>>> which are >>>>>>>>>> suitable for further publication in a BMC Bioinformatics >>>>>>>>>> Supplement. Authors will be invited to resubmit full papers. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> DEADLINES >>>>>>>>>> Submissions due: May 1st 2007 >>>>>>>>>> Notification of acceptance: May 21st 2007 >>>>>>>>>> Final versions due: May 31st 2007 >>>>>>>>>> Workshop: July 20th 2007 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- Susanna-Assunta Sansone, PhD NET Project - Coordinator >>>>>>>>>> www.ebi.ac.uk/net-project <http://www.ebi.ac.uk/net- >>>>>>>>>> project> The >>>>>>>>>> European Bioinformatics Institute >>>>>>>>>> email: sansone@ebi.ac.uk <mailto:sansone@ebi.ac.uk> EMBL >>>>>>>>>> Outstation >>>>>>>>>> - Hinxton direct: +44 (0) >>>>>>>>>> 1223 494 691 Wellcome Trust Genome Campus fax: +44 (0)1223 >>>>>>>>>> 494 468 >>>>>>>>>> Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK room: A229 >>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>> ----- ---- >>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express >>>>>>>>>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express >>>>>>>>>> and take >>>>>>>>>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it >>>>>>>>>> now. >>>>>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Obo-discuss mailing list >>>>>>>>>> Obo-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Obo- >>>>>>>>>> discuss@lists.sourceforge.net> >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Obo-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net> >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obo-discuss >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> "Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ... >>>>>>>> Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bill Bug >>>>>>> Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Laboratory for Bioimaging & Anatomical Informatics >>>>>>> www.neuroterrain.org >>>>>>> Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy >>>>>>> Drexel University College of Medicine >>>>>>> 2900 Queen Lane >>>>>>> Philadelphia, PA 19129 >>>>>>> 215 991 8430 (ph) >>>>>>> 610 457 0443 (mobile) >>>>>>> 215 843 9367 (fax) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please Note: I now have a new email - >>>>>>> William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu> >>>>>>> <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Bill Bug >>>>> Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer >>>>> >>>>> Laboratory for Bioimaging & Anatomical Informatics >>>>> www.neuroterrain.org >>>>> Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy >>>>> Drexel University College of Medicine >>>>> 2900 Queen Lane >>>>> Philadelphia, PA 19129 >>>>> 215 991 8430 (ph) >>>>> 610 457 0443 (mobile) >>>>> 215 843 9367 (fax) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Please Note: I now have a new email - William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu >>>>> <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> Bill Bug >> Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer >> >> Laboratory for Bioimaging & Anatomical Informatics >> www.neuroterrain.org >> Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy >> Drexel University College of Medicine >> 2900 Queen Lane >> Philadelphia, PA 19129 >> 215 991 8430 (ph) >> 610 457 0443 (mobile) >> 215 843 9367 (fax) >> >> >> Please Note: I now have a new email - William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu >> <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu> >> >> >> >> > > Bill Bug Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer Laboratory for Bioimaging & Anatomical Informatics www.neuroterrain.org Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy Drexel University College of Medicine 2900 Queen Lane Philadelphia, PA 19129 215 991 8430 (ph) 610 457 0443 (mobile) 215 843 9367 (fax) Please Note: I now have a new email - William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu
Received on Saturday, 5 May 2007 09:35:32 UTC