W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > May 2007

Re: SfN meeting submission

From: William Bug <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 05:35:20 -0400
Message-Id: <338EAFE5-BCB5-480E-9319-7B3C43AA5473@DrexelMed.edu>
To: public-semweb-lifesci hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
I agree completely, Kei.

Don - do you want me to set up a Google Doc for this?  If you've  
already got a Word version, this can be directly imported.  Google  
Doc can import the following word proc. docs:
	Microsoft Word (.doc), Rich Text (.rtf), OpenDocument Text (.odt)  
and StarOffice (.sxw).

If you have a Google Doc account, you can also send the doc to Google  
Docs as an email attachment (they give you a specific email to send  
it to), and Google Doc will set up the document.

Cheers,
Bill

On May 4, 2007, at 12:14 PM, Kei Cheung wrote:

> Hi Bill et al,
>
> Google doc would also be fine if people agree. Thanks for taking  
> the initiative to set it up. In my opinion, it would be important  
> to continue working with the current group of people (e.g., Alan,  
> June, Gwen, Huajun, ... if they are willing to continue to involve)  
> who've been working on the current use case/demo to help extend  
> future work, while new people can be recruited if there is a fit.  
> Just my two-cent thought. I have to go, as I need to prepare for my  
> WWW2007 workshop ...
>
> Best,
>
> -Kei
>
> William Bug wrote:
>> Hi Don, Kei, John, Matthias, et al.,
>>
>> Kudos to us all.  I realize what a crunch folks preparing for next  
>> week's demo are under, but this is an important aspect of  
>> amortizing the FANTASTIC EFFORT so many have invested in this.
>>
>> I'd suggest a Google Doc, Don.  It's really the easiest way to go  
>> by far.  Anything else - passing around a Word file or culling/ 
>> integrating copy from a Wiki are much more labor intensive.  I've  
>> been using Google Docs more and more since we did the work last  
>> Nov/Dec. on the earlier HCLS manuscript, and it's definitely been  
>> greasing the wheels on these sorts of far reaching, collaborative  
>> manuscripts.  I'd be glad to set it up - or help you set it up -  
>> if you like.  I've done this for several recent manuscripts, so  
>> I've got the "gotchas" pretty well worked out.
>>
>> Re: the content - remember - for the abstract - it's just text and  
>> very little of that.  I'd recommend the goal should be to take  
>> whatever we already have describing the demo and re-tool that for  
>> a neuroscientist/neuroinformaticist audience.
>>
>> Matthias had an excellent suggestion for a figure - which will be  
>> just what we want for the result poster, but that won't be needed  
>> until late October.  By then, if there's sufficient data, we'll be  
>> able to use the FANTASTIC tool Alan R. had recommended - Vizster  
>> (http://jheer.org/vizster/) - to create a very impressive  
>> visualization for the poster!
>> Just my unsolicited $0.02 - as always.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Bill
>>
>> On May 4, 2007, at 10:23 AM, Kei Cheung wrote:
>>
>>> Hi John, Don, Matthias, Bill, Mark , et al.,
>>>
>>> It sounds like the group has an increasing interest, enthusiasm,  
>>> commitment, and support to submit an abstract to SfN. If there is  
>>> no objection, let's go for it.
>>>
>>> Don, thanks for taking the lead on this. Is the deadline May 15?  
>>> Some people will be away next week for WWW2007. You might want to  
>>> consider creating a wiki page so that people who have been  
>>> involved in the demo (use case, data conversion,  
>>> coordination ...) can participate (just my personal suggestion).  
>>> Please let me know what I can do to help. I'll try to see if I  
>>> can go to SfN this year as the SenseLab group was invited to give  
>>> a demo at the INCF booth (International Neuroinformatics  
>>> Coordinating Facility). I'll try to talk to Gordon to see if we  
>>> can include a semantic web related demo there ...
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> -Kei
>>>
>>> jbarkley@nist.gov <mailto:jbarkley@nist.gov> wrote:
>>>> hi don,
>>>>
>>>> Works for me as well, and I'll be glad to help anyway I can.
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>>
>>>> jb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Date:  Thu, 3 May 2007 17:00:09 -0400 From:  William Bug  
>>>> <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>>  
>>>> To:  public-semweb-lifesci hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org  
>>>> <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>> Subject:  Re: SfN meeting  
>>>> submission Quoting William Bug <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu  
>>>> <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>>:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Don,
>>>>>
>>>>> This works for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> In regards to the suggestion Mark made, I think some of his   
>>>>> suggestions sound very practical.  I'd be glad to participate -  
>>>>> or  not - depending on the need and intended outcome.
>>>>>
>>>>> With this in mind, if you'd like someone to vet what you work  
>>>>> up - or  work with you on it, Don - I'd be glad to do that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Bill
>>>>>
>>>>> On May 3, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Donald Doherty wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's my proposal:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I write a quick rough draft and send a copy to all interested  
>>>>>> parties.
>>>>>> People actually contributing to the writing should mostly be   
>>>>>> neuroscientists
>>>>>> but of course include input from the rest.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then I'll take all of the input and work up a revised abstract  
>>>>>> and  send it
>>>>>> back out to all interested parties for further feedback.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Repeat until everyone is happy and/or we run out of time. Then  
>>>>>> we  decide to
>>>>>> submit or not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> About authors, here is the Neuroscience community standard.  
>>>>>> First  author is
>>>>>> usually the graduate student and last author is usually the  
>>>>>> principal
>>>>>> investigator.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Submitter must be first author...so if I take this on everyone  
>>>>>> must be
>>>>>> comfortable with me being the grad student :^). We should  
>>>>>> probably  put the
>>>>>> person who put the most sweat into the demo as last author.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hopefully the author issue won't be too divisive since this  
>>>>>> is  simply an
>>>>>> abstract. The important thing is that everyone is acknowledged.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of highest importance is that the demo gets in front of the   
>>>>>> neuroscience
>>>>>> community at their biggest meeting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Don
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org <mailto:public- 
>>>>>> semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org>
>>>>>> [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Kei  
>>>>>> Cheung
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 12:19 PM
>>>>>> To: William Bug
>>>>>> Cc: public-semweb-lifesci hcls
>>>>>> Subject: Re: SfN meeting submission
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Bill et al.,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree that it's important to make our SW/Neuro demo visible  
>>>>>> to the
>>>>>> neuroscience community. For example, I have asked Gordon  
>>>>>> Shepherd  (PI of
>>>>>> SenseLab) to look at the AD use case written by June, Gwen, et  
>>>>>> al  to see
>>>>>> if any comments/suggestions can be made. It would be great if  
>>>>>> we  can get
>>>>>> more neuroscientists involved to help make our work more   
>>>>>> scientifically
>>>>>> relevant. I believe this would also help make SW  
>>>>>> technologically  credible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regarding the SfN abstract, my concern is that we might not be  
>>>>>> able to
>>>>>> meet the deadline given that people are currently busy  
>>>>>> preparing  for the
>>>>>> upcoming demo at WWW2007 next week. In addition to what to  
>>>>>> write  and how
>>>>>> to write it (it probably won't take long for an abstract),  we  
>>>>>> need to
>>>>>> discuss how the author list should appear. All these may take  
>>>>>> some  time
>>>>>> to resolve as part of the community process, but we'd better  
>>>>>> start
>>>>>> thinking/discussing about it soon ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Kei
>>>>>>
>>>>>> William Bug wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Don, Matthias, John, Kei, et al.,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I too would like to contribute to an SfN abstract in this  
>>>>>>> context.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe given the domain HCLS IG is covering -  
>>>>>>> neurodegenerative
>>>>>>> disease - despite the lack of a full, refereed article, this  
>>>>>>> is a  very
>>>>>>> important venue in which to present, in order to help bolster  
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> relevance and credibility of this effort to the general  
>>>>>>> neuroscience
>>>>>>> community.  With a working demo, it would be a shame NOT to  
>>>>>>> have it
>>>>>>> represented at the SfN meeting.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We could also look to use such an abstract as starting  
>>>>>>> material for a
>>>>>>> full submission to journals that cover neuroinformatics such as
>>>>>>> Neuroinformatics, PLoS Computational Biology, or Journal of
>>>>>>> Computational Neuroscience.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In regards to relevant neuroscience meetings, there are also the
>>>>>>> meetings hosted by:
>>>>>>> Federation of European Neuroscience Societies (FENS):
>>>>>>> http://fens.mdc-berlin.de/calendar/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> International Brain Research Organization (IBRO):
>>>>>>> http://www.ibro.org/Pub_Events_Search.asp?Search=.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Japan Neuroscience Society
>>>>>>> http://www.jnss.org/english/index_e.html
>>>>>>> http://www2.convention.jp/neuro2007/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Federation of Asian and Oceanian Neuroscience Societies (FAONS)
>>>>>>> http://www.faons.org/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not certain what the deadlines are for the associated  
>>>>>>> meetings.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Bill
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On May 2, 2007, at 11:51 AM, Donald Doherty wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That'd be great! SfN abstracts are brief (max. 2300  
>>>>>>>> characters  including
>>>>>>>> punctuation!) so focusing on the value to neuroscientists  
>>>>>>>> sounds  like the
>>>>>>>> right course.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Abstract may be presented or posters. Slide presentations  
>>>>>>>> are  kept very
>>>>>>>> brief and there is so much going on most people won't see a
>>>>>>>> particular slide
>>>>>>>> presentation. Even if we indicate our preference for a  
>>>>>>>> slide  presentation
>>>>>>>> it's likely we wouldn't get it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If we do a poster it will be up half a day. We can bring our  
>>>>>>>> demo  machine
>>>>>>>> and set it up next to the poster. (I've seen BIRN and others  
>>>>>>>> do  this.
>>>>>>>> Wireless is generally available.) I think this is the  
>>>>>>>> preferred mode
>>>>>>>> for us.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is also a $75 submission fee.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm willing to take responsibility for paying the submission  
>>>>>>>> fee,  getting
>>>>>>>> the poster up, staying there while it's up, and working the  
>>>>>>>> demo as
>>>>>>>> long as
>>>>>>>> everyone is interested in doing this and a demo machine will be
>>>>>>>> available.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We won't get a paper out of it but I think it's worthwhile  
>>>>>>>> to  expose the
>>>>>>>> end-user community (neuroscientists) to the value the  
>>>>>>>> Semantic Web
>>>>>>>> technologies may provide to them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>>>>> Don
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org <mailto:public- 
>>>>>>>> semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org>
>>>>>>>> <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org>
>>>>>>>> [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of
>>>>>>>> samwald@gmx.at <mailto:samwald@gmx.at>
>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 9:37 AM
>>>>>>>> To: donald.doherty@brainstage.com  
>>>>>>>> <mailto:donald.doherty@brainstage.com>
>>>>>>>> <mailto:donald.doherty@brainstage.com>; public-semweb- 
>>>>>>>> lifesci@w3.org <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
>>>>>>>> <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
>>>>>>>> Subject: SfN meeting submission
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Don,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would help with the abstract for SfN where I can, of  
>>>>>>>> course. I  guess it
>>>>>>>> should be even more focussed on the requirements and use  
>>>>>>>> cases in
>>>>>>>> Neuroscience than the BMC Bioinformatics paper. Mainly a  
>>>>>>>> description
>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>> collaborating neuroscience groups, their motivation and the  
>>>>>>>> types of
>>>>>>>> information that we are integrating, and less about the  
>>>>>>>> technical
>>>>>>>> details.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I guess it is much too late to start writing a group paper  
>>>>>>>> for  the ISMB
>>>>>>>> workshop now. A poster abstract would be possible, but I  
>>>>>>>> think we
>>>>>>>> don't want
>>>>>>>> to present a poster.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This year's Society for Neuroscience meeting abstracts are  
>>>>>>>>> due  May 15th.
>>>>>>>>> I'd
>>>>>>>>> like to take the lead on submitting an abstract if the team is
>>>>>>>>> interested.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Don
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> P.S. This year's meeting is November 3-7 in San Diego,  
>>>>>>>>> California.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>> From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org <mailto:public- 
>>>>>>>>> semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org>
>>>>>>>>> <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org>
>>>>>>>>> [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of  
>>>>>>>>> Alan
>>>>>>>>> Ruttenberg
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 12:57 AM
>>>>>>>>> To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org <mailto:public-semweb-  
>>>>>>>>> lifesci@w3.org <mailto:lifesci@w3.org>>
>>>>>>>>> Subject: ISMB Bio-Ontologies Meeting
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I forget, was someone submitting an abstract about our work  
>>>>>>>>> to this
>>>>>>>>> workshop?
>>>>>>>>> -Alan
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 26, 2007, at 1:18 PM, Susanna wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ** Apologies for cross posting **CALL FOR PAPERS and POSTER
>>>>>>>>>> ABSTRACTS (Deadline May 1st)
>>>>>>>>>> Proceedings in BMC Bioinformatics
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *^**^***^****^****^****^****^****^****^****^****^****^*****^* 
>>>>>>>>>> *^*** ^**
>>>>>>>>>> Bio-Ontologies SIG Workshop
>>>>>>>>>> Vienna, Austria: July 20 2007
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Bio-Ontologies: ten years past and looking to the future"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *^**^***^****^****^****^****^****^****^****^****^****^*****^* 
>>>>>>>>>> *^*** ^**
>>>>>>>>>> 15th ISMB & 6th ECCB Vienna, Austria: July 18-25, 2007
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> CALL FOR PAPERS and POSTER ABSTRACTS (Deadline May 1st)
>>>>>>>>>> Proceedings in BMC Bioinformatics
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The long-standing ISMB Bio-Ontologies SIG is in its tenth
>>>>>>>>>> consecutive year. This year the workshop will have a  
>>>>>>>>>> celebratory
>>>>>>>>>> and reflective discussion on "Bio-Ontologies: ten years  
>>>>>>>>>> past and
>>>>>>>>>> looking to the future".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> PROGRAM CHAIRS:
>>>>>>>>>> Robert Stevens (1), Phillip Lord (2), Robin McEntire (3),  
>>>>>>>>>> Susanna-
>>>>>>>>>> A. Sansone (4)
>>>>>>>>>> 1.    School of Computer Science, University of  
>>>>>>>>>> Manchester, UK
>>>>>>>>>> 2.    School of Computing Science, University of  
>>>>>>>>>> Newcastle, UK
>>>>>>>>>> 3.    GlaxoSmithKline, USA
>>>>>>>>>> 4.    EMBL-EBI The European Bioinformatics Institute,   
>>>>>>>>>> Cambridge, UK
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> WEBSITES:
>>>>>>>>>> Bio-Ontologies SIG workshop: http://bio-ontologies.org.uk
>>>>>>>>>> ISMB & ECCB main conference website http://www.iscb.org/  
>>>>>>>>>> ismbeccb2007
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ABOUT THE BIO-ONTOLOGIES SIG WORKSHOP
>>>>>>>>>> The workshop will continue offer an informal environment for
>>>>>>>>>> presentation and discussion of ontologies and their role in
>>>>>>>>>> providing a mechanism for organising, sharing and  
>>>>>>>>>> reconciling  data.
>>>>>>>>>> This year, to celebrate its tenth anniversary, we have  
>>>>>>>>>> invited  four
>>>>>>>>>> presenters from the first bio-ontologies tutorial and meeting
>>>>>>>>>> organisers to sit on a panel, namely: Mark Musen, Peter  
>>>>>>>>>> Karp, Russ
>>>>>>>>>> Altman and Steffen Schulze-Kremer
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They will be asked to present positions on the following   
>>>>>>>>>> questions:
>>>>>>>>>> 1. What has been the best thing to have happened in bio- 
>>>>>>>>>> ontologies
>>>>>>>>>> in the past ten years?
>>>>>>>>>> 2. What has been the worst thing to have happened in bio-  
>>>>>>>>>> ontologies
>>>>>>>>>> in the past ten years?
>>>>>>>>>> 3. How must bio-ontologies progress in the next ten years?
>>>>>>>>>> 4. How must bio-ontologies not progress in the next ten years
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> CALL FOR PAPERS AND POSTER ABSTRACT:
>>>>>>>>>> We are inviting two types of submissions SHORT PAPER  
>>>>>>>>>> papers (up to
>>>>>>>>>> 4 pages) and POSTER ABSTRACT (up to 1/2 page) from any  
>>>>>>>>>> aspect  doing
>>>>>>>>>> bio-ontology research or using bio-ontologies to do  
>>>>>>>>>> bioinformatics
>>>>>>>>>> research. Topics include, but are not restricted to:
>>>>>>>>>> - Biological Applications of Ontologies
>>>>>>>>>> - Reports on Newly Developed or Existing Bio-Ontologies
>>>>>>>>>> - Tools for Developing Ontologies
>>>>>>>>>> - Use of Ontologies in Data Communication Standards
>>>>>>>>>> - Use of Semantic Web technologies in Bioinformatics
>>>>>>>>>> - The implications of Bio-Ontologies or the Semantic Web  
>>>>>>>>>> for the
>>>>>>>>>> drug discovery process
>>>>>>>>>> - Current Research In Ontology Languages and its  
>>>>>>>>>> implication for
>>>>>>>>>> Bio-Ontologies
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> PROGRAM COMMITTEE
>>>>>>>>>> Abstracts will be reviewed by the Program Committee,  
>>>>>>>>>> including the
>>>>>>>>>> Program Chairs and additionally: David Benton, Suzanna  
>>>>>>>>>> Lewis,  Chris
>>>>>>>>>> Mungall and Alan Ruttenberg.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> PUBLICATION OF THE PROCEEDINGS
>>>>>>>>>> The Programme Committee will also select those papers,  
>>>>>>>>>> which are
>>>>>>>>>> suitable for further publication in a BMC Bioinformatics
>>>>>>>>>> Supplement. Authors will be invited to resubmit full papers.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> DEADLINES
>>>>>>>>>> Submissions due: May 1st 2007
>>>>>>>>>> Notification of acceptance: May 21st 2007
>>>>>>>>>> Final versions due: May 31st 2007
>>>>>>>>>> Workshop: July 20th 2007
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -- Susanna-Assunta Sansone, PhD NET Project - Coordinator  
>>>>>>>>>> www.ebi.ac.uk/net-project <http://www.ebi.ac.uk/net- 
>>>>>>>>>> project> The
>>>>>>>>>> European Bioinformatics Institute
>>>>>>>>>> email: sansone@ebi.ac.uk <mailto:sansone@ebi.ac.uk> EMBL   
>>>>>>>>>> Outstation
>>>>>>>>>> - Hinxton direct: +44 (0)
>>>>>>>>>> 1223 494 691 Wellcome Trust Genome Campus fax: +44 (0)1223  
>>>>>>>>>> 494 468
>>>>>>>>>> Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK room: A229
>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>>>>>>>>> ----- ----
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
>>>>>>>>>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express  
>>>>>>>>>> and take
>>>>>>>>>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it  
>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Obo-discuss mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> Obo-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Obo- 
>>>>>>>>>> discuss@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:Obo-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/obo-discuss
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> "Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ...
>>>>>>>> Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bill Bug
>>>>>>> Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Laboratory for Bioimaging  & Anatomical Informatics
>>>>>>> www.neuroterrain.org
>>>>>>> Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy
>>>>>>> Drexel University College of Medicine
>>>>>>> 2900 Queen Lane
>>>>>>> Philadelphia, PA    19129
>>>>>>> 215 991 8430 (ph)
>>>>>>> 610 457 0443 (mobile)
>>>>>>> 215 843 9367 (fax)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please Note: I now have a new email -  
>>>>>>> William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>
>>>>>>> <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Bill Bug
>>>>> Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer
>>>>>
>>>>> Laboratory for Bioimaging  & Anatomical Informatics
>>>>> www.neuroterrain.org
>>>>> Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy
>>>>> Drexel University College of Medicine
>>>>> 2900 Queen Lane
>>>>> Philadelphia, PA    19129
>>>>> 215 991 8430 (ph)
>>>>> 610 457 0443 (mobile)
>>>>> 215 843 9367 (fax)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please Note: I now have a new email - William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu  
>>>>> <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Bill Bug
>> Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer
>>
>> Laboratory for Bioimaging  & Anatomical Informatics
>> www.neuroterrain.org
>> Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy
>> Drexel University College of Medicine
>> 2900 Queen Lane
>> Philadelphia, PA    19129
>> 215 991 8430 (ph)
>> 610 457 0443 (mobile)
>> 215 843 9367 (fax)
>>
>>
>> Please Note: I now have a new email - William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu  
>> <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Bill Bug
Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer

Laboratory for Bioimaging  & Anatomical Informatics
www.neuroterrain.org
Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy
Drexel University College of Medicine
2900 Queen Lane
Philadelphia, PA    19129
215 991 8430 (ph)
610 457 0443 (mobile)
215 843 9367 (fax)


Please Note: I now have a new email - William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu





Received on Saturday, 5 May 2007 09:35:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:20:26 UTC