- From: Kei Cheung <kei.cheung@yale.edu>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:11:57 -0400
- To: Trish Whetzel <whetzel@pcbi.upenn.edu>
- Cc: "Miller, Michael D (Rosetta)" <Michael_Miller@Rosettabio.com>, William Bug <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>, "Smith, Barry" <phismith@buffalo.edu>, "Kashyap, Vipul" <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>, samwald@gmx.at, public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, obo-relations@lists.sourceforge.net, Paul Spellman <spellman@bdgp.lbl.gov>, Shrikant Mane <shrikant.mane@yale.edu>
Hi Trish, I agree with you. -Kei Trish Whetzel wrote: > Hi Kei, > > This is really exciting to see someone talking about this. I mentioned > this idea last year to the hcls list and personally is a direction > that I wish mged was heading in for data mining, etc. > > Trish > >>> Before going into further >>> detail about how to convert NINDS microarray data into OWL ... >> >> one item i was unclear on was what the scope of conversion of microarray >> data into OWL you have in mind. my take on this, as i said previously, >> is that in MAGE and eventually in MAGEv2, the actual performance of the >> microarray experiment and the results are captured in the XML schema >> generated from the UML model. there is also the ability to annotate, >> using the ontology package, all the objects in the XML document. it's >> this annotation i believe can be easily translated into RDF or OWL, >> based on the early version of the OMG Ontology Metamodel. the rest of >> the document is easily comparable with other documents at the XML or UML >> level. >
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2007 20:12:11 UTC