W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > January 2007

RE: Versioning vs Temporal modeling of Patient State

From: Kashyap, Vipul <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:34:46 -0500
Message-ID: <2BF18EC866AF0448816CDB62ADF6538105EAF09E@PHSXMB11.partners.org>
To: "Trish Whetzel" <whetzel@pcbi.upenn.edu>
Cc: "Nigam Haresh Shah" <nigam@stanford.edu>, "kc28" <kei.cheung@yale.edu>, "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, "w3c semweb hcls" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>

> It is not as though the state 'non-existent' is replaced with
> another state with a new name, at least that is how I am thinking of
> versioning. The instance data to describe the state of the tumor is
> different based on some action, e.g. passing of time.

[VK] I agree with the above.. I was rather loose in the modeling aspects and
just wanted to convey the basic idea. I wouldn't consider this as versioning
though!




THE INFORMATION TRANSMITTED IN THIS ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSON OR ENTITY TO WHOM IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR PRIVILEGED MATERIAL.  ANY REVIEW, RETRANSMISSION, DISSEMINATION OR OTHER USE OF OR TAKING OF ANY ACTION IN RELIANCE UPON, THIS INFORMATION BY PERSONS OR ENTITIES OTHER THAN THE INTENDED RECIPIENT IS PROHIBITED.  IF YOU RECEIVED THIS INFORMATION IN ERROR, PLEASE CONTACT THE SENDER AND THE PRIVACY OFFICER, AND PROPERLY DISPOSE OF THIS INFORMATION.
Received on Friday, 12 January 2007 00:35:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:20:22 UTC