RE: [Fwd: Re: identifier to use]

hi all,

i forgot the URL (or is it a URI or URN?)

cheers,
michael

http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/life_sciences.htm


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
> Miller, Michael D (Rosetta)
> Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 11:29 AM
> To: Eric Jain; Ricardo Pereira
> Cc: public-semweb-lifesci; Sean Martin
> Subject: RE: [Fwd: Re: identifier to use]
> 
> 
> hi all,
> 
> > Is there any chance that this will find it's way back into 
> > the LSID spec?
> 
> great thought but...
> 
> the spec is an OMG spec through the Life Sciences working group.  i3c
> worked on it in collaboration with this group but i3c is dead and the
> members of the Life Sciences group most interested in the LSID are no
> longer members per se (not sure quite how true this is, IBM is still a
> member of OMG and sean martin did a great deal of the (excellent) work
> on the spec and implementation but i don't know how much interest they
> would have).  the OMG revision process is quite straight-forward,
> especially for something of this nature, but there have to be OMG
> members interested in doing the work.
> 
> not to say there aren't other venues, including de facto adoption.
> 
> cheers,
> michael
> 
> Michael Miller
> Lead Software Developer
> Rosetta Biosoftware Business Unit
> www.rosettabio.com
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org 
> > [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Eric Jain
> > Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 5:38 AM
> > To: Ricardo Pereira
> > Cc: public-semweb-lifesci
> > Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: identifier to use]
> > 
> > 
> > Ricardo Pereira wrote:
> > > 
> > http://wiki.tdwg.org/twiki/bin/view/GUID/LsidHttpProxyUsageRec
> > ommendation
> > 
> > Looks like a good solution for people who are using LSID (for 
> > whatever 
> > reason) and want to make their data more accessible on the 
> > Semantic Web!
> > 
> > Together with the content negotiation mechanism described in 
> > one of the 
> > comments on this page, this could also make resolving an LSID into 
> > something useful (for normal people) as easy as resolving 
> e.g. a DOI.
> > 
> > Is there any chance that this will find it's way back into 
> > the LSID spec?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Saturday, 25 August 2007 20:27:02 UTC