- From: Michel_Dumontier <Michel_Dumontier@carleton.ca>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:17:43 -0400
- To: Nigam Shah <nigam@stanford.edu>, Matthias Samwald <samwald@gmx.at>, brandizi@ebi.ac.uk, Eric Neumann <eneumann@teranode.com>
- Cc: W3C HCLSIG hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, "M. Scott Marshall" <marshall@science.uva.nl>
Fantastic material Nigam (and co)! I hope you don't mind if I use some for my 4th year bioinformatics class :-) Couple of points: Problem: Asserting disjointness between classes that are definable. Example (slide 100): Rural Area and Urban Area are disjoint; Woomera is initially asserted to be a rural area, and it is later develops into an urban area. How do you intend to manage this change? Will you then create a new instance of Woomera, assert it as an urban area, and link it to the rural Woomera? Better to not make these disjoint.... Problem: Ontology normalization. Slide 108: "An InfectiousPneumonia is either a BacterialPneumonia or a ViralPneumonia." An infectious pneumonia is a pneumonia caused by an infectious agent. Rather that asserting the union of specific agent caused pneumonia, one should instead define a class of infectious agents. Thus, we can automatically discover whether the agent is in fact infectious. Moreover, this is easier to maintain. Slide 115: providing definitions for property characteristics would be useful here - the difference between functional/inverse function may not be clear from these examples (as a SIN is also functional - at least in Canada) Great job! -=Michel=- -- > From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Nigam Shah > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 12:49 PM > To: 'Matthias Samwald'; brandizi@ebi.ac.uk; 'Eric Neumann' > Cc: 'W3C HCLSIG hcls'; 'M. Scott Marshall' > Subject: RE: HCLS Demo at ISMB/ECCB, How to contribute to the demo? > > > >Matthias Samwald wrote: > > >... but the result is much > >more useful when some basic ontology design criteria are met and the > >information in the source databases is re-interpreted to form a > >meaningful ontology. Unfortunately I cannot point you to a short, > >comprehensive document that would describe the design philosophy I am > >thinking of -- this is something that still needs to be written, I > >guess. > > > > > >[1] http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/ > >[2] http://www.ifomis.uni-saarland.de/bfo/ > >[3] http://obofoundry.org/ > > Barry Smith and I did a tutorial on how to make and use Biomedical > Ontologies at ISMB 2007. The handout is at http://tinyurl.com/3dxeg8. > Section 5, do's and don't's of ontology creation summarizes a lot of > the design criteria. (Section -5 contains materials provided by Barry > Smith and Andrew Spear). > > Cheers, > Nigam. >
Received on Tuesday, 14 August 2007 19:18:14 UTC