- From: kei cheung <kei.cheung@yale.edu>
- Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 12:51:46 -0400
- To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Cc: donald.doherty@brainstage.com, wilbanks@creativecommons.org, 'Daniel Rubin' <dlrubin@stanford.edu>, public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, 'Matthew Cockerill' <matt@biomedcentral.com>
Hi Alan, Thanks for pointing us to FuGO. To me, it seems like that the FuGO community is currently defining an upper ontology that can be universally used to describe different types of genomic/proteomic experiments including microarray experiments. There is a draft OWL version of FuGO (http://fugo.sourceforge.net/ontology/FuGO.owl). A list of use case uses is also shown at: http://fugo.sourceforge.net/ontologyInfo/ontology.php, but there is no example use for microarray experiments. So it might be worthwhile to take a look at how FuGO can be used to describe microarray experiments (at least at a high level). Cheers, -Kei Alan Ruttenberg wrote: > > On Jun 5, 2006, at 9:15 PM, kc28 wrote: > >> It might be time to think about how to convert mged ontology or >> mage-ml into RDF/OWL. The following are two related articles: >> >> http://www.nature.com/msb/journal/v2/n1/full/msb4100052.html >> http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v23/n9/full/nbt0905-1095.html >> >> Cheers, >> >> -Kei > > > As I understand it, this is the nature of the FuGO project: > http://fugo.sourceforge.net/ > They have an upcoming workshop > http://www.ebi.ac.uk/microarray/General/Events/FuGO2006/index.html > > -Alan > >
Received on Tuesday, 6 June 2006 16:51:57 UTC