W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > July 2006

Re: [BioRDF] All about the LSID URI/URN

From: Carole Goble <carole@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:12:41 +0100
Message-ID: <44CDC989.9090205@cs.man.ac.uk>
To: William Bug <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>
CC: jbarkley@nist.gov, Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, ht@inf.ed.ac.uk, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, connolly@w3.org, w3c semweb hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, Sean Martin <sjmm@us.ibm.com>


Of course Susie is doing a fabulous job! And I have already told her 
this. Gracious! calm down,

my point was that this had been reported to me as a key "make or break" 
meeting on LSIDs and I just wanted to point out that many people who are 
interested cannot come today.

It was no criticism of Susie and none was intended. If you read the 
message no criticism of Susie is actually made.
Susie, we love you


> Hi All,
> I would also give a strong DITTO to the leadership Susie is providing 
> on this extremely important issue.  Getting clarification on the pros 
> & cons is essential to catalyzing broader adoption of SWTech.
> I would also add I'm extremely grateful to ALL the experts who've been 
> presenting clear arguments and information related to this issue.  
> It's all been extremely valuable.  Susie is working very hard to 
> collate this information and provide this as a resource to the 
> community.  As Alan mentioned, this will remain an ongoing and 
> critical debate, and it will be of value to us all to help provide a 
> clearing house for documentation related to to this issue on the 
> BioRDF Wiki pages.
> The group of people listening in on this debate here on this list are 
> a self-selected population of technically astute folks with 
> implementation of SWTech on their minds - and probably on their 
> immediate list of TODOs, if not already on their list of previous 
> achievements.  Most will be very knowledgeable of the general 
> technical issues and will be likely to dig into the details presented 
> on both sides of the argument.   I have found all the details 
> extremely illuminating - especially the thorough background and 
> references provided by Sean and the specifics given regarding the 
> debates the TAG has had on this issue.
> I think I can assure Carole no one here would be likely to take the 
> achievements of those who've implemented LSID-based systems - and ARK 
> and the others - lightly - or those who might, would be doing 
> themselves and the communities they represent a great disservice.
> I look forward to Monday and the follow-up discussions both on the 
> list, in future TCons, and on the HCLSIG-BioRDF Wiki.
> Cheers,
> Bill
> On Jul 29, 2006, at 8:09 AM, jbarkley@nist.gov 
> <mailto:jbarkley@nist.gov> wrote:
>>> (who very much appreciates Susie's efforts to
>>> coordinate)
>> Ditto on that!
>> jb
>> Quoting Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:alanruttenberg@gmail.com>>:
>>> Susie shouldn't take any blame for this - The meeting is
>>> one in a 
>>> series, is well announced, and would certainly have been
>>> rescheduled 
>>> if, like,  anyone with an interest had bothered to
>>> request it with 
>>> adequate advance notice.
>>> There's nothing particularly special about this meeting.
>>> If others with 
>>> interest in the subject want a further meeting to discuss
>>> things then 
>>> we should do that.
>>> Regards,
>>> Alan
>>> (who very much appreciates Susie's efforts to
>>> coordinate)
>>> On Jul 28, 2006, at 2:24 PM, Carole Goble wrote:
>>>> By the way I have already lodged an objection to Susie
>>> that to have 
>>>> such a telecon when many people who actually, like, use
>>> the stuff for, 
>>>> like, real are at ISMB2006 in Brazil and will not be
>>> able to 
>>>> participate. Like Doh!
>>>> Carole
> Bill Bug
> Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer
> Laboratory for Bioimaging  & Anatomical Informatics
> www.neuroterrain.org
> Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy
> Drexel University College of Medicine
> 2900 Queen Lane
> Philadelphia, PA    19129
> 215 991 8430 (ph)
> 610 457 0443 (mobile)
> 215 843 9367 (fax)
> Please Note: I now have a new email - William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu 
> <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>
> This email and any accompanying attachments are confidential. 
> This information is intended solely for the use of the individual 
> to whom it is addressed. Any review, disclosure, copying, 
> distribution, or use of this email communication by others is strictly 
> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us 
> immediately by returning this message to the sender and delete 
> all copies. Thank you for your cooperation.
Received on Monday, 31 July 2006 09:13:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:20:18 UTC