W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > July 2006

Re: [BioRDF] All about the LSID URI/URN

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:05:14 -0400
Message-Id: <8FD2D33B-896A-428A-BC09-D60B759EC01D@gmail.com>
Cc: systemsbiology <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org
To: Phillip Lord <phillip.lord@newcastle.ac.uk>

On Jul 25, 2006, at 12:55 PM, Phillip Lord wrote:
> But if the file you are referencing is, say 5Tb, then it doesn't work
> in a browser at all. With LSID's on the other hand, you may get back a
> choice of methods to access the data, including one which can cope
> with 5Tb of data.

Could this specific issue be handled in the http protocol? Could  
there be a new response code that in effect says: "Status  
99999999999: The information resource you have requested is too #&%^  
big and the provider has decided that you need to use one of the  
following access methods to get at it", followed by a list of  
protocols in a manner similar to what lsid provides?

There are a couple of related codes already (101, 413), but neither  
is exactly what is desired it seems.

Received on Monday, 31 July 2006 03:05:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:20:18 UTC