- From: John Barkley <jbarkley@nist.gov>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 07:52:43 -0400
- To: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
- Cc: <jbarkley@nist.gov>
- Message-ID: <004a01c6a997$8399ac00$8a3a0681@ncsl.nist.gov>
On the BIONT call last Tuesday (July 11), we discussed some of the points
that Bill made in his email on XML vs. RDF. Based on a suggestion by Alan to
dig deeper into this question, we discussed the idea of using short examples
to illustrate the technical differences between XML vs. RDF.
For my colleagues, I created a simple example that I thought I would share
(attached) illustrating the difference between XML and RDF with respect to
the automated validation of semantic consistency.
jb
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kashyap, Vipul" <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>
To: "w3c semweb hcls" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 7:11 PM
Subject: [BIONT] Teleconference (Date correction) Tomorrow, Tuesday 11th
July, 2006
Phone: +1 617 761 6200, conference 24668 ("BIONT")
IRC: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/hcls
Browser-based IRC client: http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc
Date and Time: 11th July, 2006, 11:00am - 12:00pm
Agenda:
- Discuss progress on Ontology Task Force tasks
- Any other discussion
=======================================
Vipul Kashyap, Ph.D.
Senior Medical Informatician
Clinical Informatics R&D, Partners HealthCare System
Phone: (781)416-9254
Cell: (617)943-7120
http://www.partners.org/cird/AboutUs.asp?cBox=Staff&stAb=vik
To keep up you need the right answers; to get ahead you need the right
questions
---John Browning and Spencer Reiss, Wired 6.04.95
Attachments
- application/pdf attachment: consistency-validation-RDFvXML.pdf
Received on Monday, 17 July 2006 11:53:44 UTC