- From: Eric Jain <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>
- Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 01:27:31 +0100
- To: public-semweb-lifesci <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Jim Hendler wrote: > I love this idea, but I would go a bit further - be even nicer for us > non-biologists if it also included some example queries to run (and > maybe even the correct answer sets) - I think if that existed, we could > push some of the triple store developers to use it as a benchmark, which > would help both communities... In addition to the queries mentioned in the Oracle paper, the following queries may be interesting to test some of the more advanced capabilities, if present: 1. Filter some query by taxonomic kingdom, e.g. "Bacteria". This tests how efficiently inference is handled, Taxa are referenced through rdfs:subClassOf, and only the most specific Taxon is directly referenced from a Protein. 2. Group-by query to determine the most frequent keyword or GO term (referenced through classifiedAs) in a set of Proteins. 3. Output a mapping from one database to another via UniProt, e.g. EMBL to MIM. Both are referenced from UniProt through rdfs:seeAlso, a "database" property indicates the database name in which the resource is located. This query isn't very complicated, but could produce a large result set.
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2006 00:31:14 UTC