- From: Eric Jain <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>
- Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 01:08:07 +0100
- To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Ian Wilson wrote: > That would be great. Since these graphs change over time, do archived > annual snapshots make sense? Any thoughts on how you might derive these > subgraphs? You are likely more familiar than anyone else with these graphs. > > The separate graphs you provide for distribution are already nicely > divided (e.g. Taxonomy, Sequence, GO, etc.) - so, I was thinking for > benchmarking purposes, it would be nice to have these graphs > incorporated into the subgraphs defined for benchmarking. http://www.isb-sib.ch/~ejain/rdf/data-for-benchmarks/
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2006 00:11:47 UTC