- From: Wafik Farag <Wafik@Farag.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:39:40 -0400
- To: <Phillip.Lord@newcastle.ac.uk>, <wangxiao@musc.edu>, <helen.chen@agfa.com>
- Cc: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, <public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org>, <wangxiao@musc.edu>
- Message-ID: <004701c5c429$b3aaddf0$0300a8c0@WFB100>
Hi Helen, I thought the power of the SW is linking those monolithic fragmented domains or sub-domains into one with no over-arching layer. Maybe I am wrong -- please someone correct me here. The idea of creating another over arching layer to connect the sub-domains might seem defeating the purpose. How will this over arching layer react to any change in any of the underlying sub-domains -- will it need to be changed/adjusted every time one of the underlying sub-domains is changed??? I think the power of the SW is in linking ontologies -- creating RDF statements in each ontology to establish a link. Best -Wafik Farag ----- Original Message ----- From: helen.chen@agfa.com To: Phillip.Lord@newcastle.ac.uk ; wangxiao@musc.edu Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org ; public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org ; wangxiao@musc.edu Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 12:02 PM Subject: RE: Antwort: RE: Semantic web article in Nature Biotechnology Hi, Phil and Xiaoshu >> (3) All these ontologies are still developed in a monolithic manner. >> No consideration about the granuality and practicality has been >> emphasized. >There have been many considerations of practicality made. Monolithic >development is a problem, but both OBO and the MGED ontologies have >been attemping to ensure consistency between ontologies as well as >minimise overlap. Even with many considerations and increasing community efforts in developing ontologies to be consumed by semantic web, I am afraid the "monolithic development" problem will be with us for a long time. Ontologies developed within different specialties and sub-domains will always be fragmented and rather "monolithic" in their own right. In Healthcare domain, different regulatory bodies may develop ontologies for their practice guidelines, and disease management centers develop their own care plans and protocols. It is not realistic to hope for a well-coordinated ontology that covers everything nicely under the hood. What I understand of the power of semantic web technology lays the connecting and inference capability between those "fragmented" knowledge bases. This connection is to be reached by a thin layer of "over-arching" ontology and a set of basic rules. We have limited experience in linking (mapping) our rather "monolithically developed" RPGOntology (ontology for EU-radiation protection guideline) with SNOMED CT(http://www.snomed.org/snomedct/). The benefit of such connection can not be over-stated. Helen --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Helen Chen, Ph.D Research and Innovation Center for Healthcare Global Architecture and Design Group Agfa Healthcare http://www.agfa.com/healthcare
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2005 12:39:59 UTC