- From: Joanne Luciano <jluciano@predmed.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 14:21:22 -0400
- To: "'Eric Jain'" <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>, "'Geoff Chappell'" <gchappell@intellidimension.com>
- Cc: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Maybe you guys know... Is there a way to link UniProt IDs and GO (Gene Ontology) IDs? Is there a database that has both? Eric, can this be done indirectly through the KEGG/RDF work you did? Thanks, Joanne > -----Original Message----- > From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Eric Jain > Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 1:49 PM > To: Geoff Chappell > Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > Subject: Re: Uniprot RDF in RDF Gateway > > > Geoff Chappell wrote: > > I imagined this was probably the case. It might be worth > highlighting > > for folks on your site > > Yes, good idea. > > > > Yeah, it's unfortunate there isn't a meaningful common > superclass of > > those (since the they all describe ranges on the timeline). > I suppose > > you could make the range the union of the three types. > > We used this approach in the XML Schema for the plain XML > version of our data [http://www.uniprot.org/support/docs/uniprot.xsd]. > > Unfortunately Protege (which is used to maintain the > ontology) doesn't seem to support custom data types, and I > suspect other RDF tools may have problems, too... > > > >
Received on Thursday, 12 May 2005 18:21:34 UTC