- From: Eric Jain <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 19:48:37 +0200
- To: Geoff Chappell <gchappell@intellidimension.com>
- CC: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Geoff Chappell wrote: > I imagined this was probably the case. It might be worth highlighting for > folks on your site Yes, good idea. > Yeah, it's unfortunate there isn't a meaningful common superclass of those > (since the they all describe ranges on the timeline). I suppose you could > make the range the union of the three types. We used this approach in the XML Schema for the plain XML version of our data [http://www.uniprot.org/support/docs/uniprot.xsd]. Unfortunately Protege (which is used to maintain the ontology) doesn't seem to support custom data types, and I suspect other RDF tools may have problems, too...
Received on Thursday, 12 May 2005 17:45:37 UTC