W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-secondscreen@w3.org > May 2015

Re: Proper sources for cross-references?

From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 14:55:34 +0000
To: "mark a. foltz" <mfoltz@google.com>
CC: "public-secondscreen@w3.org" <public-secondscreen@w3.org>, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
Message-ID: <76AD3EF6-4093-499E-8187-71363B2CDFF6@intel.com>
Hi Mark,

> On 01 May 2015, at 00:15, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org> wrote:
> 
>>> On 29 Apr 2015, at 23:27, mark a. foltz <mfoltz@google.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> (2) If the answer to (1) is "bleeding edge", should we fix up the cross references list (or, better, adopt or sync with one that someone else maintains)?
> 
> It's certainly a good idea to fix bugs in the cross-references list if we find some, and to align with a good cross-references list maintained by someone else as much as practical.

Please feel free to use the upstream whatwg/xref:

  https://github.com/whatwg/xref

If whatwg/xref works for the current spec, please update the step 10 in:

  https://www.w3.org/wiki/Second_Screen/Work_Mode#Direct_Spec_Contributions

Dominik had some reason for forking xref I forgot, but I think that issue may have been resolved in upstream now.

Thanks,

-Anssi

>>> [1] https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/
>>> [2] http://heycam.github.io/webidl/
>>> [3] https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#domexception
Received on Monday, 4 May 2015 14:56:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 4 May 2015 14:56:55 UTC