Re: [presentation-api] Security and privacy evaluation and considerations

[Since we didn't use a purpose built action tracker and just 
piggybacked on the GH issues for tracking F2F actions, I took the 
liberty to just amend the corresponding comment above.]

Closed actions from the F2F:

>ACTION: @mfoltzgoogle to see if there is any data that can be shared 
about initiating [a user's action] from the browser or the page. 
[recorded in 
http://www.w3.org/2015/05/19-webscreens-minutes.html#action04]

@mfoltzgoogle Thanks for the data. In the light of this, I suggest the
 group attempts to accommodate both the use cases as proposed.

>ACTION: @tidoust to look into "incognito" requirements on the spec 
[recorded in 
http://www.w3.org/2015/05/19-webscreens-minutes.html#action07]

@tidoust Thanks for looking into this. For the record, the [Private 
Mode Browsing][1] spec is currently very much work-in-progress. The 
"incognito" requirements should be brought up during the TAG review as
 they may raise the priority of the said spec, volunteers.

[1]: http://w3ctag.github.io/private-mode/

-- 
GitHub Notif of comment by anssiko
See 
https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/issues/45#issuecomment-112397977

Received on Tuesday, 16 June 2015 11:54:26 UTC