W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-secondscreen@w3.org > June 2015

Re: Timing of TAG review

From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 12:57:48 +0000
To: "mark a. foltz" <mfoltz@google.com>
CC: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>, "public-secondscreen@w3.org" <public-secondscreen@w3.org>
Message-ID: <993B291F-B001-4B44-9E41-2197E94294D1@intel.com>
Hi MarkFo,

> On 08 Jun 2015, at 19:54, mark a. foltz <mfoltz@google.com> wrote:

> Yes, part of the goal is to solicit feedback from the wider developer community and improve the implementation based on real world usage.  Since this is a relatively major feature with dependencies on several browser components, the sooner we can get this feedback, the better.

Real world feedback is great to get this early on. We should expect some spec churn based on developer feedback (which is great to get). Implementers should be prepared for some possible backwards incompatible changes too.


> So is the plan to finish the items outlined by Francois, publish a report in the TR space and then request review?  Just trying to gauge the scope of work remaining for the editor here :)

If that plan sounds reasonable to you given your schedule, that'd be perfect. However, I note there are quite many issues open, so please let us know if you think you'd prefer us to triage the issues to be able to resolve only the highest priority ones prior to TAG review.

Also, the other group members are encouraged to help close the issues by submitting proposals, pull requests.


-Anssi (WG chair)
Received on Tuesday, 9 June 2015 13:01:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:18:56 UTC