W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-secondscreen@w3.org > August 2015

Re: [presentation-api] Assess interoperability of Presentation API implementations

From: Louay Bassbouss via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 08:57:45 +0000
To: public-secondscreen@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-134531122-1440493065-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Thx @hsablonniere I will consider your comments and discussion from 
#164. I think on protocols level it will easier to see the diff 
between 1-UA and 2-UA. On API level you don't see any diff between 
both cases since it is designed to consider both in the same way.
@mfoltzgoogle @anssiko @all I would like to create a seperate markdown
 document (e.g. interoperability.md) and put everything related to 
this task there. What do you think?

Von: Hubert SABLONNIÈRE [mailto:notifications@github.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. August 2015 14:52
An: w3c/presentation-api <presentation-api@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Bassbouss, Louay <louay.bassbouss@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Betreff: Re: [presentation-api] Assess interoperability of 
Presentation API implementations (#153)


@louaybassbouss<https://github.com/louaybassbouss> : As said in 
#164<https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/issues/164>, I would 
really be interested in explicit definition of 1-UA and 2-UA but also 
in a relevant technologies and protocols as examples.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on 
GitHub<https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/issues/153#issuecomment-133416338>.


-- 
GitHub Notif of comment by louaybassbouss
See 
https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/issues/153#issuecomment-134531122
Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2015 08:57:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 25 August 2015 08:57:49 UTC