Re: minutes of SDWIG 2020-05-28

On Thu, 2020-05-28 at 22:32 +0000, Joseph Abhayaratna wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> Apologies here too, I was recovering from surgery and didn't think an
> 11pm call was the best idea __
> 
> (numbering for topics mentioned by Chris)
> 
> 1. +1 to a single WG too. Note: I'm not sure I'm fully across what
> the requirements of a WG are when compared with an IG. @Ted Guild,
> could you refresh my memory? I believe it lets us publish Notes and
> such, so I expect there's a bit more rigour around our activities as
> a result of that?

An IG can publish Notes but typically not anything on W3C REC track.
Per SDWIG charter it can maintain specs produced by SDWWG on REC track.
A WG can publish Notes as well and start new work but I believe needs
to recharter for new specs to go on REC track. Somewhat rigid but we
can do some exploration and spin up additional Community Groups (CG)
that coordinate with us easily. I'm not concerned and find IG more
limiting.

https://www.w3.org/2019/Process-20190301/

> 4. +1 to meet every 4 weeks
> 
> (adding)
> 
> 5. On the topic of GeoSPARQL, who else is interested in the update of
> that standard? We'd be very interested in getting your feedback on
> both the White Paper and Charter, as well as gauging your interest in
> participating in the SWG should it go forward. @Bill Roberts, I
> figured you'd be interested, and saw you were in the minutes. Anyone
> else?
> 
> Cheers,
> Jo
> Joseph Abhayaratna Chief Technical Officer _____________________
> ___________________
> PSMA Australia Ltd        Unit 6, 113 Canberra Avenue   Grif
> fith  ACT
>    2603         (02) 6260 9042    
> Joseph.Abhayaratna@psma.com.au
>      
> www.psma.com.au class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> |  
> www.geoscape.com.au                           
> This message contains information that may be privileged or
> confidential and is the property of PSMA Australia. It is intended
> only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the
> intended recipient, you are not authorised to read, print, retain,
> copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part
> thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the
> sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.  All
> outgoing emails and attached files are virus scanned, but we do not
> represent that this email and any attached files are free from
> computer viruses or other defects. Further, we do not accept any
> liability for any damage caused by this email or attachments. ABN 23
> 089 912 710  
> 
> On 29/5/20, 4:29 am, "Little, Chris" <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk>
> wrote:
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> Apologies for not making it at all - my first meeting overran into
> second meeting.
> 
> 1. +1 to a single WG
> 
> 2. There is some Time Ontology work led by Simon Cox that could be
> full Rec track work. Also some other stuff on the horizon too (E.g.
> Buddhist technologists getting their calendars sorted). 
> 
> There may be collaboration with ISO TC154/WG5 too.
> 
> 3. OGC has put Geo Ethics on the agenda for future Tech Conf
> 
> 4. +1 to meet every 4 weeks or Gregorian calendar month
> 
> Thank you, Brinkwoman,
> 
> Chris
> 
> Chris Little BA, MSc, FRMetS, MBCS
> Chair, OGC Meteorology & Oceanography Domain Working Group
> Chair, OGC Temporal DWG
> Member, OGC Architecture Board
> 
> IT Fellow - Operational Infrastructures
> Met Office FitzRoy Road Exeter Devon EX1 3PB United Kingdom
> Tel: +44(0)1392 886278 Fax: +44(0)1392 885681 Mobile: +44(0)7753
> 880514
> E-mail: chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk http://www.metoffice.gov.uk
> 
> 
> 
-- 
Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
W3C Automotive Lead
https://www.w3.org/auto