- From: Élie Roux <elie.roux@telecom-bretagne.eu>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 08:29:22 +0200
- To: "Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton)" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>, "public-sdwig@w3.org" <public-sdwig@w3.org>
> ISO 19108 defines four 'indeterminate values' for temporal position. > - 'now' - which corresponds with the time it is de-referenced I wonder if that would play well with RDF... it seems it would make some strange inference > - 'after T1' - so if T1="now" then it says that we don't know when it is but it is later than now > - 'before T1' - so if T1="now" then it says that we don't know when it is but it is earlier than now How would these differ from time:before and time:after? > - 'unknown' - we don't know what the relationship between it and any other instant is > > Perhaps we should add these to OWL-Time to support your use-cases. I'm not really sure how I would use these... Do you mean I should say something like "the Common Era ends at an undetermined point in the future after now"? Well, originally I was against this idea as I don't think eras have ends at all (not even in the future), but now I'm starting to think that it doesn't really matter, I could just use a time:Interval and not have any time:hasEnd property... would that work? Thanks, -- Elie
Received on Monday, 20 July 2020 06:29:46 UTC