W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdwig@w3.org > July 2020

Re: OWL-Time extensions for Era

From: Élie Roux <elie.roux@telecom-bretagne.eu>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 10:55:14 +0200
Message-ID: <CANfi1JjAsQ59hxLYKFk8ysrXtpNQSigxzy+jiANzk=p-Gq7_UA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton)" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
Cc: "public-sdwig@w3.org" <public-sdwig@w3.org>
Dear Simon and all,

I've checked the thors and gts ontologies, excellent work, thanks!

As pointed out by Chris, some eras of my proposal don't have a concept
of end, their use just goes in and out of style. This is the case for
the Common Era, but also the Buddhist Era, the Tibetan Royal Years,
etc. So I don't think my proposal of time:Era can be interpreted as a
time:TemporalEntity, and thus not as a thors:Era...

So I wouldn't change anything to my proposal. Unless perhaps you think
it would be useful if my proposal also included concepts such as
time:LeftBoundedInterval, time:RightBoundedInterval,
time:UnboundedInterval and time:GeneralInterval? I'm definitely not
the most qualified person on this list to make such a proposal as I
don't know much about Allen temporal algebra... but I can give it a
shot if it helps.

What do you all think?

Best,
-- 
Elie
Received on Sunday, 19 July 2020 08:55:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 19 July 2020 08:55:40 UTC